DiscussMormonism.com

OK, let's take that into account. But doesn't that undercut your whole argument? According to your OP, we should expect to see higher rates of fatal shootings by folks in their 70s. I'm not suggesting that 70-year-olds commit more gun violence, but it could be the case that a lot of 70-year-olds, w...

Really, nobody owes you a darn bit of respect if you can't even stay on your own topic. This has nothing to do with your last OP that the mods rightfully merged with this thread. And your second sentence is ridiculous, a desperate way to save your failed OP. What are you talking about man? Okay, wh...

Imagine it's the 1940s, and if I were to say things like "I dated another man", I would get a bunch of angry responses. People would call me an abuser, a creep, a predator, and would say that I am obsessed with other men. I would get accused of breaking the law , and people would claim that he and I...

Everybody Wang Chung wrote: ↑

Sat Apr 27, 2024 10:24 pm

I am curious Mr. attorney, should a 26 year old go to prison for life for having a relationship with a single mom in a state where the age of consent is at least 17, if not lower?

So why don't you just acknowledge what is painfully obvious to anyone who reads the thread? With all due respect, you always crucify me when I am not precise with my wording. I never admitted to that, so Dr. Exile shouldn't accuse me of admitting things I didn't admit to, even if it's obvious what ...

Marcus and Dr. Exile would be cheering with joy and celebrating such news.

Unfortunately for them, I am a healthy man and I don't have cancer.

Of course, no one here would speculate that I committed a crime and harass me with a bunch of nonsense.

What Dr. Exiled is doing is called abuse, harassment, and defamation.

Dr. Shades wrote: ↑

Sat Apr 27, 2024 9:16 am

What does any of that have to do with your statement, "as evidenced by this board?"

I am more interested in discussing the main points.

Morley wrote: ↑

Sat Apr 27, 2024 12:28 am

2) Neither of these papers claims what you say it does.

Seriously? That's just some serious confirmation bias on our part.

Just because I am not precise with my wording doesn't mean that the point is wrong.

Forgive me for not mentioning "average populations" and the limitations of the studies.