DiscussMormonism.com

Haha, you are threatening a poster that if they don't participate how you want you are going to harrass them?

That's pretty dark.

True. Isn't it marvelous?

but tell me, Velo, why do you bother to point it out? Are you offended that MG irritates me more than you could ever hope to?

rather than make a case that your policies put the American people first and are in their best interests? why don't you make a case that your policies put the American people first and are in their best interests? Saying it over and over isn't making a case for it. This is another one of your silly...

The post you quoted was an accusation. It may be true or false, but it isn't a fallacy. An accusation that is factually incorrect isn't a logical fallacy. A logical fallacy makes a claim incoherent or meaningless, or otherwise problematic such that you don't get to the part about investigating facts...

I have no interest in going down this track with you. I think that's great. Why don't you go back to the original thread and try to get into the conversation's topic, rather than a meta discussion about the conversation -- (can the conversation ultimately tell us anything since everyone is living a...

That's still going on?

I'm not on Facebook or anything but I thought the woke stuff had slowed down.

Perfect, moderators. I wish I would have thought of it. Every time MG steps into a conversation where people are arguing facts, and turns into phil 101 questioning if we can know anything at all, you should totally split that post and all responses off and put it here. It's the ultimate derail. That...

I cannot get inside the minds of those that have a worldview that may not completely dovetail with mine. You've already established that, the point is, just like per you, as critics, we can't get into the minds of believers therefore we must acknowledge their equally valid worldview, are you willin...

Gadianton marks me as as being solipsistic. No, I marked you as a 6-day creation fundamentalist who operates in a black and white world, believing that you have the absolute 100% truth, playing the solipsism card only when specific topics come up that you don't have good answers for. You are not a ...

One thing that Dan Petersen and MG 2.0 have in common is that they are both solipsists. Well, not really. They actually both believe in the most extreme frameworks of absolute truth, believing that they indeed have the absolute truth, but unable to make an argument, they pretend to be solipsists. Th...

Some MTP (Moderator Type Person) eradicated my EITPQ (Earthquake Invitation Type Poll Questions), but marring it as was did fulfilled prophecy, so thanks whoever it was, for playing your part. Someone had to crucify Christ … everyone has a role to play. Instead of the DS using his powers to restore...