DiscussMormonism.com

The doctrine of the baby that has me asking the questions is the section that was removed from the King Follet discourse by The Brethren in the 1920's(that is the date I have been told, may not be correct) I am only too familiar with manuals for Sunday School being watered down until now many have o...

Can you name a single professional archaeologist in 1823? That would be Larry the digger, professional archaeologist who unearthed old graves and would have hot babes lie in them with him to 'feel the spirit' as he tried to get them to feel him a bit. There is no such thing as 'Book of Mormon' archa...

The whole thing proves GordieB and Tommy are inspired leaders. The Poor need some place to aspire to for shopping for when they become middle to upper class.

What a waste... $3 Billion and they won't even have a Victorias Sacred, not Secret.

Oh, and I am also still waiting for ONE thing that shows Book of Mormon archaeology or peoples were here. And the folks who live on the moon and dress like Quakers are 6 feet tall. The moon landing guys didn't meet them because they landed during Siesta, they were asleep.

So was Joseph Smith lying when he said the Lamanites were in the area he was in North America? He says it plainly in this letter, in the section LDSinc does not print in the manual.

PR = BS

Tithing money of the faithful wasted in trying to appear in the Emperors New Clothes.

Old enough to understand that never expecting to live to be this age effected life every day. I figured long ago I would probably be rotting away in a rice paddy in SE Asia as so many of my friends ended up. The folly is LDSinc supported that lie just as they support the invasion of Iraq... another ...

The point is simple. Resurrection unites the material and spiritual. When all the material for the bodies equals all the raw material on earth... no more left to create more bodies and that is 'the end'? After all, God didn't create raw material, just organized it per Joseph. So, you run out of raw ...

bs-space writes once again: "A manual published by the Church is official doctrine."

Lectures on Faith? The Lecture at the veil? Older manuals that now contradict the newer ones on some basic 'doctrine'?

What is, is and what isn't, isn't except when it is, is right, right?