DiscussMormonism.com

Kishkumen wrote:Yes, he certainly does. A wealth of words spent on a poverty of ideas.

Everyone got a bad deal there.

Vacuous is as vacuous says.

Kishkumen wrote:I guess Droopy couldn't refrain from returning. Big surprise there. If only he had anything worthwhile to say.

To be fair, he does use a lot of words.

cwald: Just remember, it's not an attack if an apologist does it.

Selek is Pahoran-lite: All the bluster and venom, none of the intellect and wit.

It's sad that the only options BYU sees are keeping the aggressive and often-ludicrous apologetics of the past or replacing it with Religion Department pablum.

Kishkumen wrote:Stunning, I know.

One wonders if he really believes in all this apocalyptic BS about "Evangelizing Apostates" trying to destroy the faith of the elect.

Kishkumen wrote:Perhaps they established a consensus on the piece before he wrote this deliberate misrepresentation of "apostate" views of the Dehlin situation.

Schryver lying about apostates? Who would have thought?