DiscussMormonism.com

Kishkumen wrote: ↑

Sat Mar 23, 2024 3:32 am

I am thinking it’s something more like this:

Has it name, will you give it to me?

You may see the logo across our website and in various other social media venues. If it is not immediately visible to you, it will be in the very near future. https://interpreterfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/wyatt-new-format-logo-300x75.png Notice how the new Interpreter icon is very si...

https://www.cannabismarketingschool.com/

As for the logo.... I am inclined to think it looks a bit like a side-view of a Slinky in motion. You know: when you set the spiral-shaped toy in motion, it sort of flops over and briefly forms a rainbow-like shape that's not unlike the new logo. Actually, "Slinky in motion" rather sounds like a go...

Now, I must confess that I don't know what the curious symbol next to the organization's name is intended to represent. An open book (shades of the time-honored practice of bibliomancy)? Rays of light? A heavenly gate? Dowsing rods in motion? My imagination is running wild. In any case, these are e...

I went to the original source and read all of Charlotte's writings about Nauvoo. Joseph's mom grabbed the leg bone (Charlotte thought it was a club) and began her sermon regarding the Book of Abraham and other rantings. And then graciously accepted the quarter. Oh brother! Her description of Joseph...

Thanks for the podcast I enjoyed it. You were the first person that pointed out that some of Mormon scripture was founded on grave robbing. And worse they embrace it. They reinterpret it for self promotion. Recall how Charlotte Haven witnessed Joseph Smith's nutty mother picking up a leg bone of on...

* Horr commissioned his scribe to encode Abrahamic content Nothing could be further from the truth. The Mormons have slandered the Egyptians in every way possible and Mormon scholars have sold themselves to the father of all lies. Goble is a liar and cheat in the same category with Gee and Muhleste...

Oh dear, he's still doing this? I've never seen a more obvious and deeply embedded case of assuming one's conclusion. He is so insistent that he is right about this that he cannot look objectively at anything. It's all about saving Joseph Smith and maintaining faithful testimony in a man who lied a...

You got all these people apostatizing from the church and you got a bunch of apologists telling everyone “Phelps is responsible” for Joseph Smith’s papers. The critics know that Joseph Smith is responsible for his own papers and the critics laugh at it and the people that have apostatized from the ...