DiscussMormonism.com

Marcus wrote: ↑

Thu Jan 26, 2023 3:02 pm

Oh boy. You really need to stay away from talking “science.” Or that or get yourself a legitimate scientific education.

How about this: https://www.biologyonline.com/dictionar ... production

Thanks, Wade Englund

Let’s see… the clarion call of the Flat Earth Society? They are hardly inside-the-box-only thinkers I had in mind… Of course not. That’s because your thinking is illogical and you don’t realize that what you sound like to others is nothing like the image you apparently have built up in your mind. T...

Shulem wrote: ↑

Thu Jan 26, 2023 8:50 pm

I like that!

Thanks.

I am so glad it resonated with you. Some people might have felt insulted to be compared with vain psycho-babbling. But, not you. If the shoe fits...

Thanks, Wade Englund

Marcus wrote: ↑

Thu Jan 26, 2023 8:27 pm

wenglund wrote: ↑

Thu Jan 26, 2023 8:04 pm

…Does this sound familiar? …

Let’s see… the clarion call of the Flat Earth Society?

They are hardly inside-the-box-only thinkers I had in mind.

Thanks, -Wade Englund

IT should probably also be noted that by far most crackpot ideas or fanstsies proved to be nothing more than crackpot ideas and fantasies. So...there's hardly any reason to think the next crackpot idea will, or any one in particular, will turn into some great breakthrough. Your statement could very...

These days I tend not to get involved in the kinds of discussions on the Book of Abraham you linked to because they tend to lean heavily, if not exclusively, on the puny arms of flesh, and as such they completely ignore and even distract from the spiritual purpose for which the Book of Abraham was ...

https://preview.redd.it/kylzxhyf37ea1.jpg?width=640&crop=smart&auto=webp&v=enabled&s=fd17753d2d5442263ab2b2c7b83228d9724ef84a It should be noted that quite a few scientific and medical advancements were originally considered as crackpot or fantasies, and were mocked and ridiculed, including, Copern...

Its worse than that. Here is a quote from Wenglund’s website… https://web.archive.org/web/20041216173721/http://www.aros.net/~wenglund/sad.htm Wade, you are not making it into the Celestial Kingdom. Classifying things according sexual attraction disorders is quite different than classifying things ...

People taking offence where none should legitimately be taken…. No, that’s wrong. It is legitimately offensive that you define homosexuality as a disorder. You are demonstrably incorrect. It is no more offensive than correctly defining the following as disorders: dyslexia, webbed toes, anxiety, ast...

Very eloquently said, Wade. It’s a pity that more prominent apologists—like Daniel Peterson and the FAIR Mormon leadership—lack your honesty and introspection. It’s no wonder that you wound up going your separate ways. You may not understand this, but members who are inclined to defend the faith ca...