Res Archer is in prison for being a liar and fraud, and that is a fact.
Are you familiar with the facts of the case that landed Archer in prison? Can you tell me exactly what he did that defrauded the tribe?
I note the following event from just a couple of months ago -
Elizabeth Holmes is slated to be sentenced on 26 September after being found guilty of defrauding Theranos investors, according to a court filing on Wednesday.
A California jury found Holmes, 37, guilty on four of 11 charges, including three counts of fraud and one count of conspiring to defraud private investors in the blood-testing startup. She remains free on a $500,000 bond while awaiting sentencing.
Holmes faces up to 20 years in prison for the charges but will probably receive far fewer, according to experts, given her lack of criminal history.
Using Markk's logic, everyone that knew Holmes and/or was involved with and invested in Theranos must surely be guilty of fraud and corruption.
If they got the monies up front MZ would not have needed the Biden name... is that MZ wanted a chunk of it and that is why he went after the son of the man that would be a big part of how th e monies were distributed. Remember the ex-president of Poland is on record of saying that Hunter was only hired because of his name...
So the ex-president of Poland is on record saying that hiring Hunter was because of his name, and your statement above implies the Biden name was "needed" so that MZ could get part of the money. Did the ex-pres of Poland say that also, or are you connecting the two things with no basis to so so, and implying a conspiracy that wasn't there?
I'll be more specific. Are you misrepresenting what the polish ex pres was saying?
Apparently, anyone who has ever been hired to be on a board because of their star power must be guilty of fraud and corruption.
If they got the monies up front MZ would not have needed the Biden name... is that MZ wanted a chunk of it and that is why he went after the son of the man that would be a big part of how th e monies were distributed. Remember the ex-president of Poland is on record of saying that Hunter was only hired because of his name...
So the ex-president of Poland is on record saying that hiring Hunter was because of his name, and your statement above implies the Biden name was "needed" so that MZ could get part of the money. Did the ex-pres of Poland say that also, or are you connecting the two things with no basis to so so, and implying a conspiracy that wasn't there?
I'll be more specific. Are you misrepresenting what the polish ex pres was saying?
What evidence do you have that Joe Biden had any involvement in how any money was distributed?
he/him we all just have to live through it,
holding each other’s hands.
So the ex-president of Poland is on record saying that hiring Hunter was because of his name, and your statement above implies the Biden name was "needed" so that MZ could get part of the money. Did the ex-pres of Poland say that also, or are you connecting the two things with no basis to so so, and implying a conspiracy that wasn't there?
I'll be more specific. Are you misrepresenting what the polish ex pres was saying?
What evidence do you have that Joe Biden had any involvement in how any money was distributed?
None, of course, because there isn’t any. I would like Markk to explain his innuendo about the polish ex-pres’ comment when in reality Markk took his statement so far out of context that he’s telling the equivalent of a lie. If not, and his argument is he hasn’t read the full statement and is just parroting another conspiracy theory based on less than nothing, that’s even worse.
So the ex-president of Poland is on record saying that hiring Hunter was because of his name, and your statement above implies the Biden name was "needed" so that MZ could get part of the money. Did the ex-pres of Poland say that also, or are you connecting the two things with no basis to so so, and implying a conspiracy that wasn't there?
I'll be more specific. Are you misrepresenting what the polish ex pres was saying?
What evidence do you have that Joe Biden had any involvement in how any money was distributed?
Res, do you really believe that the Ukraine, especially eastern Ukraine, then, and even now, is not corrupt. Once the Ukraine gets this money it is game on and the oligarchs and corrupt politicians start the frenzy. Kick backs is a way of life in places like that and even here in the US. Every one gets a piece of the action so to speak as the monies trickle down. We have our unions and defense contractors etc, places like the Ukraine have oligarchs and dirty politicians…it is how big business is done.
Try reading this… a friend of mine recommended it too me, I paid the full price for it two or three years ago…it is a stea at 3 bucks.
So the ex-president of Poland is on record saying that hiring Hunter was because of his name, and your statement above implies the Biden name was "needed" so that MZ could get part of the money. Did the ex-pres of Poland say that also, or are you connecting the two things with no basis to so so, and implying a conspiracy that wasn't there?
I'll be more specific. Are you misrepresenting what the polish ex pres was saying?
Apparently, anyone who has ever been hired to be on a board because of their star power must be guilty of fraud and corruption.
No, not at all, but if their boss is a Russian backed Oligarch, known and wanted for corruption…who was a minister for ecology for a corrupt country and owned a energy producing company and steered permits to his company through that minister position…LOL come on pakes…wake up.
LOL…okay Please go ahead and explain what he did and why he got a prison term and had to forfeit over 15 million and pay restitution of over 40 million for the scheme. He is a liar Res, and now you are defending him and you are using him as a “witness” for your assertion (straw-man). Becasue he told a journalist he was not guilty of anything, you just believe that? By the way, according to one Article I read, the tribe that Archer and his confederates were swindling is among the poorest in the nation.
What evidence do you have that Joe Biden had any involvement in how any money was distributed?
None, of course, because there isn’t any. I would like Markk to explain his innuendo about the polish ex-pres’ comment when in reality Markk took his statement so far out of context that he’s telling the equivalent of a lie. If not, and his argument is he hasn’t read the full statement and is just parroting another conspiracy theory based on less than nothing, that’s even worse.
Please show me how I took it out of context, and please also paste the video, that was on a national TV interview, where Hunter says it is because of his name he is “wanted.”
