jon wrote:Another non substantive ad hom, homophobic, attacking post from the lightweight subgenius. Don't posters get a 'time out' ban for something akin to this?
my post was as relevant and as substantive to the thread as Chap's - even with the same cause, do you propose a "time-out" for Chap as well? or is that condemnation only for those whose opinion you find differs from your own?
(Moderator Note)Subgenius, Please take a break.You have been warned that when participating in the Celestial Forum, comments are to remain civil. It is perfectly acceptable to disagree and debate, but this is a scholarly, "rated G" forum where only polite conversation is permitted. If you had any questions about the rules, you were free to PM me. I received no such PM, so I am assuming that you fully understand the rules of this forum. You are therefore suspended for one week.
Although the comment you made would have been perfectly acceptable in the Terrestrial Forum, it is unacceptable here. You may want to reconsider which forum you choose to debate in.
jon wrote:Another non substantive ad hom, homophobic, attacking post from the lightweight subgenius. Don't posters get a 'time out' ban for something akin to this?
my post was as relevant and as substantive to the thread as Chap's - even with the same cause, do you propose a "time-out" for Chap as well? or is that condemnation only for those whose opinion you find differs from your own?
(Moderator Note) To be completely clear, the call I am making is based on the rules...not differing opinions. Chap is not receiving a time out because he did not personally attack you or anyone else in the forum.