Drifting wrote:...Mormon leaders have attempted to whitewash Mormon history and keep it away from the eyes of members.
oh, i see....now you found some feeble way to justify your feeble position. nice backpedal and revision
Romney is alleged of using an modus operandi of a similar ilk, which, given his connections, may well have been learnt from the example of the Church.
interesting, the OP makes no mention of this, nor does it even attempt to correlate an "m.o." with the church, nor does it even illustrate the church having done anything similar.
Care to contribute to that discussion?
i saw no actual discussion in the OP, but i am glad to contribute to the relatively easy dismantling of the OP.
So, rather than admit your post is posted in the wrong forum, and rather than admit the already transparent motive behind such a post, you would rather compromise what little integrity you may have had left and insist that you actual intended your post to be about "Mormonism". Nice character trait, now i see why your topics are always so insightful and wrought full of ever deepening exploration of "Mormonism" can we talk about baptisms for the dead now? or how about anything having to do with Brigham Young? Why have you not implicated the FLDS as actually being endorsed by the church....or better yet, got a post where the church prophet's have secretly been meeting with the Pope and the USA President in an effort to control the genealogical record of the world so that the New World Order can begin with ancestry.com?
WOW, so many words but still no comment on the subject matter of the OP. Are you Romney?
“We look to not only the spiritual but also the temporal, and we believe that a person who is impoverished temporally cannot blossom spiritually.” Keith McMullin - Counsellor in Presiding Bishopric
"One, two, three...let's go shopping!" Thomas S Monson - Prophet, Seer, Revelator
Drifting wrote:...Mormon leaders have attempted to whitewash Mormon history and keep it away from the eyes of members.
oh, i see....now you found some feeble way to justify your feeble position. nice backpedal and revision
Romney is alleged of using an modus operandi of a similar ilk, which, given his connections, may well have been learnt from the example of the Church.
interesting, the OP makes no mention of this, nor does it even attempt to correlate an "m.o." with the church, nor does it even illustrate the church having done anything similar.
Care to contribute to that discussion?
i saw no actual discussion in the OP, but i am glad to contribute to the relatively easy dismantling of the OP.
So, rather than admit your post is posted in the wrong forum, and rather than admit the already transparent motive behind such a post, you would rather compromise what little integrity you may have had left and insist that you actual intended your post to be about "Mormonism". Nice character trait, now i see why your topics are always so insightful and wrought full of ever deepening exploration of "Mormonism" can we talk about baptisms for the dead now? or how about anything having to do with Brigham Young? Why have you not implicated the FLDS as actually being endorsed by the church....or better yet, got a post where the church prophet's have secretly been meeting with the Pope and the USA President in an effort to control the genealogical record of the world so that the New World Order can begin with ancestry.com?
Political discussions concerning anything to do with Romney are allowed in this forum. Just because you choose to not see a connection has no bearing on the already apparent connection.
Derails are not allowed in this forum. Neither are personal attacks. Get back on topic and cease comments like "you would rather compromise what little integrity you may have had left".
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.