Themis wrote:So you admit you have nothing. I was never commenting on what palerobber said, although his makes more sense, and one that even many Christians would agree with.
thanks for the confirmation that palerobber's post has "nothing", obviously my point was proven.
and i appreciate that "nothing" is what makes sense to you and the other members of the evangelical horde. Now it is clear why 3 is one and 1 is actually three...it just "makes sense" to you guys.
Seek freedom and become captive of your desires...seek discipline and find your liberty I can tell if a person is judgmental just by looking at them what is chaos to the fly is normal to the spider - morticia addams If you're not upsetting idiots, you might be an idiot. - Ted Nugent
subgenius wrote:thanks for the confirmation that palerobber's post has "nothing", obviously my point was proven.
I never said any such thing. Again I am not sure why you think being dishonest is getting you anywhere. I just never commented on him, and I doubt he was worried about providing evidence for an opinion.
and i appreciate that "nothing" is what makes sense to you and the other members of the evangelical horde. Now it is clear why 3 is one and 1 is actually three...it just "makes sense" to you guys.
You just can't help being dishonest can you. I suspect his comments were not really about whether God exists, but about whether we have the ability to choose to be good or bad. Another-words God didn't have to make people be good here.
in order to make a choice, as opposed to the physiological illusion of making a choice, an individual must simply choose to do otherwise. If sentience and feeling are natural (as in not divine or supernatural characteristics) then sentience and feeling are bound by natural laws. Physiologically, or biologically, speaking this is considerably founded in the laws of chemistry. Either you consider sentience and feeling to be products of biochemical reactions (natural) or you consider them not to be products of biochemical reactions (supernatural).
More assertions without any evidence. You are making up assumptions without any real thought or evidence to back them up.