http://byustudies.BYU.edu/PDFLibrary/18.2Larson.pdf
Are you aware of what the term "memory hole" means and where it comes from?
All you've done here is prove the nondoctrinicity of the OP.
http://byustudies.BYU.edu/PDFLibrary/18.2Larson.pdf
Are you aware of what the term "memory hole" means and where it comes from?
bcspace wrote:It is l-dsinc doctrine per your guidelines, being published in an official l-dsinc publication. Here is where you can find it:
http://LDS.org/ensign/1971/05/the-king- ... n?lang=eng
Thanks for the CFR which shows that the OP portion in question is not doctrine.Hoping I would catch what? I am not seriously invested in this thread.
That's okay. Joseph doesn;t seem to be very invested either. Or Buffalo. Just looking for evidence of doctrine in the original claim. None found so far.
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.
B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.