Is belief in the 'current' Church more believable?

The upper-crust forum for scholarly, polite, and respectful discussions only. Heavily moderated. Rated G.
_Buffalo
_Emeritus
Posts: 12064
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:33 pm

Re: Is belief in the 'current' Church more believable?

Post by _Buffalo »

bcspace wrote:
The brethren have proclaimed publicly that they have no idea why blacks were denied the priesthoods, and that previous reasons were folk doctrine. You'd better head down to the COB and straighten them out.


Statements on the reasons, right or wrong, don't change the fact that it's still doctrine that descendents of Cain were denied the priesthood. It has not been stated that this in and of itself was wrong. Just that certain opinions as to why are wrong.


So the General Authorities are out of harmony with official doctrine. Got it.
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.

B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
_bcspace
_Emeritus
Posts: 18534
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 6:48 pm

Re: Is belief in the 'current' Church more believable?

Post by _bcspace »

Statements on the reasons, right or wrong, don't change the fact that it's still doctrine that descendents of Cain were denied the priesthood. It has not been stated that this in and of itself was wrong. Just that certain opinions as to why are wrong.

So the General Authorities are out of harmony with official doctrine.


The very definition of LDS doctrine the Church puts out implies they can be. However on this particular issue, it doesn't appear to be the case.
Machina Sublime
Satan's Plan Deconstructed.
Your Best Resource On Joseph Smith's Polygamy.
Conservatism is the Gospel of Christ and the Plan of Salvation in Action.
The Degeneracy Of Progressivism.
Post Reply