huckelberry wrote:subgenius wrote:So, for you, the desire to tell the truth is expressed by "discrimination, persecution, hostility or prejudice".....got it!
This has the brilliant strategic insight of debate wins such as asking "when did you stop beating your wife?".
Your opening post presented two different versions of what anti-mormon means. One definition is narrowly focused upon negative versions. The other definition is broad enough to include both positive and negative versions. This allows a clever trick where somebody agrees to be part of the broad version because they see something positive then you get to switch categories and accuse them with the negative version.
i believe i was fairly straightforward with the "wikipedia" definition as being the basis of the discussion. If you would like to offer a definition that suits you better then feel free to start another thread and your own wikipedia. Just because you do not like the wikipedia definition does not render it inaccurate...as your post is passively confirming.
however, i do appreciate your conspiracy theory about a "clever trick" though it is wildly speculative, incorrect, and lacking "brilliance", "strategy", and "insight".
huckelberry wrote:If this is still too complicated a simpler observation can be made.
There are people who say things critical of the LDS church who are respectably interested in the truth. There are other people who say critical things who are malignant fanatics, out of touch with the truth. These two are not the same.
sure they are the same...they are both critical and their fundamental motivations are likely the same - their excuses may differ, but as critics - they are the same.
Being "interested in the truth" is hardly honest justification for being critical, there is a reason for that interest and why that interest is specific to the church - "interested in the truth" is not some sort of general hobby with the church being just as good as any other quarry.
Even then, having that interest is one thing, but being motivated to "say things critical" is another...it is the latter that speaks to the foundation of my inquiry in the OP.