Albion wrote:Drifting, I guess my problem with Mormon proof texts is that so often they ignore the flow and purpose of a passage. Based on the merest glimmer of a word or phrase that they like, Mormons seem to seize on it as support for some purely LDS doctrine or practice totally ignoring the context in which the words are used. The chapter in Ezekiel has nothing whatsoever to do with a book, doesn't even mention the word or even use a word that could be mistaken for book, but is seized upon as somehow upholding the Book of Mormon. Mormonism doesn't fit the description of the tiniest hair on the tail of a dog yet they claim to wag the entire religious dog. Last week, I was in the holocaust museum in Jerusalem wondering how in creation people could be so inhuman to other human beings when the realization came that that it was only by taking away the very humanity of their victims that the Nazis could justify their actions. While I don't liken Mormons to Nazis, I do liken the process to Mormonism. The big lie of Mormonism is that all Christendom is corrupt, that all who profess it are an "abomination". With this lie in place and swallowed it is easy to then supplant the Christian message with the bizarre beliefs of Mormonism because they have instantly removed the core (humanity parallel) foundation of the opposition. Smith was nothing if not devious.
I have LOTS of problems with Mormonism. But one that stands out is that Mormons will take an oddball verse concerning being baptized for the dead as literal. But then they seem to accept the beginning of Genesis as figurative. And yet there is verse after verse with the sons names and number of years listed.... I don't get it.