Noah's Ark questions

The upper-crust forum for scholarly, polite, and respectful discussions only. Heavily moderated. Rated G.
Post Reply
_SPG
_Emeritus
Posts: 527
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2016 12:47 am

Re: Noah's Ark questions

Post by _SPG »

Lemmie wrote:Link?


I don't have it. Someone from NOM hooked me up with it about 8 years ago, but it was a sort a back, past the search engine link. If you try to use the search engine, as I just did, you get nothing. But it was about 7 accounts of Joseph Smith that were unbiased, nether for or against, just as they remembered things. One account was someone that was actually in school with him for a while.

But I'll look around my links and see if I can find it. I'm sure I saved the link, but I cannot find it right now.
_Maksutov
_Emeritus
Posts: 12480
Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 8:19 pm

Re: Noah's Ark questions

Post by _Maksutov »

.
"God" is the original deus ex machina. --Maksutov
_SPG
_Emeritus
Posts: 527
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2016 12:47 am

Re: Noah's Ark questions

Post by _SPG »

Maksutov wrote:.

Short and to the point.
_EdGoble
_Emeritus
Posts: 301
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2014 3:37 am

Re: Noah's Ark questions

Post by _EdGoble »

Themis wrote:
One wonders why Adam is needed in a world where humans have been running around for many ten's of thousands of years. At least the original story has him as integral as the first human. :twisted:


Well, it wasn't to be the first human, so much as the first "man."

There are many kinds of humans. Actual spirit sons and daughters of Elohim, on the other hand, are not necessarily just "human." Spirit children of Elohim have "human" bodies to be sure, as DNA shows continuity from our bodies to theirs.

If we analyze the new October 2016 statement in the New Era, it seems to makes a distinction between regular "humans" (i.e. human bodies inhabited by spirits of whatever) and actual spirit Chidlren of God:

Before we were born on earth, we were spirit children of heavenly parents, with bodies in their image. God directed the creation of Adam and Eve and placed their spirits in their bodies. We are all descendants of Adam and Eve, our first parents, who were created in God’s image. There were no spirit children of Heavenly Father on the earth before Adam and Eve were created. (https://www.LDS.org/new-era/2016/10/to-the-point?lang=eng)


I don't know how far I would take this in my own personal beliefs. But if one is to go by this new statement, it seems clear here, that the most recent statement on Evolution is drawing a new line in the sand. Even anatomically modern humans are not all literal spirit "Children of God." In theory, those before Adam were not of the literal spirit family of Elohim. Therefore the family of Elohim is not the only kind of humans that can supply human-looking spirits to human bodies. The humans that pre-dated Adam are apparently not spirit children of the Gods, but are also of lesser human orders which come very close, and who have lots of intelligence and are capable even of bronze-age technology, but still apparently are not capable of sin. Once we had Spirit Children of Elohim entering those bodies, then we really had the "temporal" age of the earth, the time of sin on the earth, with spirits capable of it. (D&C 77:6)

The Book of Moses speaks of Adam as the first man of all men. This is clear that it has to do with something Spiritual now instead of something literal for the human race. The human race clearly is comprised of more than one family group of spirits with the form of anatomically modern humans, some being of the race of gods, and some not.
_Lemmie
_Emeritus
Posts: 10590
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2015 7:25 pm

Re: Noah's Ark questions

Post by _Lemmie »

Ed Goble wrote:The human race clearly is comprised of more than one family group of spirits, some being of the race of gods, and some not.


What do you mean by this, Ed?
_Maksutov
_Emeritus
Posts: 12480
Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 8:19 pm

Re: Noah's Ark questions

Post by _Maksutov »

EdGoble wrote:
Themis wrote:
One wonders why Adam is needed in a world where humans have been running around for many ten's of thousands of years. At least the original story has him as integral as the first human. :twisted:


Well, it wasn't to be the first human, so much as the first "man."

There are many kinds of humans. Actual spirit sons and daughters of Elohim, on the other hand, are not necessarily just "human." Spirit children of Elohim have "human" bodies to be sure, as DNA shows continuity from our bodies to theirs.

If we analyze the new October 2016 statement in the New Era, it seems to makes a distinction between regular "humans" (i.e. human bodies inhabited by spirits of whatever) and actual spirit Chidlren of God:

Before we were born on earth, we were spirit children of heavenly parents, with bodies in their image. God directed the creation of Adam and Eve and placed their spirits in their bodies. We are all descendants of Adam and Eve, our first parents, who were created in God’s image. There were no spirit children of Heavenly Father on the earth before Adam and Eve were created. (https://www.LDS.org/new-era/2016/10/to-the-point?lang=eng)


I don't know how far I would take this in my own personal beliefs. But if one is to go by this new statement, it seems clear here, that the most recent statement on Evolution is drawing a new line in the sand. Even anatomically modern humans are not all literal spirit "Children of God." In theory, those before Adam were not of the literal spirit family of Elohim. Therefore the family of Elohim is not the only kind of humans that can supply human-looking spirits to human bodies. The humans that pre-dated Adam are apparently not spirit children of the Gods, but are also of lesser human orders which come very close, and who have lots of intelligence and are capable even of bronze-age technology, but still apparently are not capable of sin. Once we had Spirit Children of Elohim entering those bodies, then we really had the "temporal" age of the earth, the time of sin on the earth, with spirits capable of it. (D&C 77:6)

The Book of Moses speaks of Adam as the first man of all men. This is clear that it has to do with something Spiritual now instead of something literal for the human race. The human race clearly is comprised of more than one family group of spirits with the form of anatomically modern humans, some being of the race of gods, and some not.


Interesting. You're taking Mormonism in the directions of concepts found in Swedenborg, Qaballah, the Spiritualists and Theosophists.
"God" is the original deus ex machina. --Maksutov
_EdGoble
_Emeritus
Posts: 301
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2014 3:37 am

Re: Noah's Ark questions

Post by _EdGoble »

Lemmie wrote:
Ed Goble wrote:The human race clearly is comprised of more than one family group of spirits, some being of the race of gods, and some not.


What do you mean by this, Ed?


I thought that the statement was very clear.
All animals have spirit parents.
Chimpanzees have spirit parents that are celestial Chimps.
Gorillas have spirit parents that are celestial Gorillas.
Neanderthals have Spirit parents that are celestial Neanderthals. They are not gods.
Homo Erectus have spirit parents that are celestial Homo Erectus.
And Anatomically modern humans (Cro Magnon) that are Homo Sapien Sapiens from *before Adam* have celestial spirit parents that are different from Elohim and his wife, although with the same bodily structure, who are not gods. These Cro Magnons are incapable of sin, distinguishing them from the spirit Children of Elohim.

Is this clear enough?
_EdGoble
_Emeritus
Posts: 301
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2014 3:37 am

Re: Noah's Ark questions

Post by _EdGoble »

Maksutov wrote:Interesting. You're taking Mormonism in the directions of concepts found in Swedenborg, Qaballah, the Spiritualists and Theosophists.


I take in the direction that I believe it needs to go, whether these things exist among other groups already or not, "Hermetic" or not.
_Maksutov
_Emeritus
Posts: 12480
Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 8:19 pm

Re: Noah's Ark questions

Post by _Maksutov »

EdGoble wrote:
Maksutov wrote:Interesting. You're taking Mormonism in the directions of concepts found in Swedenborg, Qaballah, the Spiritualists and Theosophists.


I take in the direction that I believe it needs to go, whether these things exist among other groups already or not, "Hermetic" or not.


Perhaps your reasons are, or were, their reasons. I don't see it as simply a "hermetic" orientation. In the last century its morphed into forms that might not fit easily under that grouping, like UFO contactees.
"God" is the original deus ex machina. --Maksutov
_EdGoble
_Emeritus
Posts: 301
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2014 3:37 am

Re: Noah's Ark questions

Post by _EdGoble »

Maksutov wrote:Perhaps your reasons are, or were, their reasons. I don't see it as simply a "hermetic" orientation. In the last century its morphed into forms that might not fit easily under that grouping, like UFO contactees.


Perhaps, although it is odd that you bring UFO contactees into it. I guess I can count on you to make it sound as bizarre as possible.

"Truth is truth, wher'er 'tis found,
On Christian or on heathen ground,"
and worthy of our love and admiration, whether far or near, high or low, whether blazing as a star in the blue vault of heaven, or springing like a floweret from the soil.
--Orson F. Whitney
Post Reply