Why Do LDS Dismiss the Greater Part of the New Testament?

The upper-crust forum for scholarly, polite, and respectful discussions only. Heavily moderated. Rated G.
Post Reply
_gdemetz
_Emeritus
Posts: 1681
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2012 5:59 pm

Re: Why Do LDS Dismiss the Greater Part of the New Testament

Post by _gdemetz »

Just admit it Albion. You were caught in your own web, and you can't give a good response. You just repeated the old man made evangelical doctrine that there is only one heaven, and when I told you that the Bible mentions three, then you just didn't know how to respond, once again!
_Drifting
_Emeritus
Posts: 7306
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 10:52 am

Re: Why Do LDS Dismiss the Greater Part of the New Testament

Post by _Drifting »

gdemetz wrote:Just admit it Albion. You were caught in your own web, and you can't give a good response. You just repeated the old man made evangelical doctrine that there is only one heaven, and when I told you that the Bible mentions three, then you just didn't know how to respond, once again!


Doesn't Mormonism teach that there are five levels of heaven?
Telestial
Terrestrial
Celestial - three separate levels within it
“We look to not only the spiritual but also the temporal, and we believe that a person who is impoverished temporally cannot blossom spiritually.”
Keith McMullin - Counsellor in Presiding Bishopric

"One, two, three...let's go shopping!"
Thomas S Monson - Prophet, Seer, Revelator
_Yoda

Re: Why Do LDS Dismiss the Greater Part of the New Testament

Post by _Yoda »

Drifting wrote:
gdemetz wrote:Just admit it Albion. You were caught in your own web, and you can't give a good response. You just repeated the old man made evangelical doctrine that there is only one heaven, and when I told you that the Bible mentions three, then you just didn't know how to respond, once again!


Doesn't Mormonism teach that there are five levels of heaven?
Telestial
Terrestrial
Celestial - three separate levels within it

Yes, that is correct.
_ludwigm
_Emeritus
Posts: 10158
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 8:07 am

Re: Why Do LDS Dismiss the Greater Part of the New Testament

Post by _ludwigm »

gdemetz wrote:nothing relevant
Drifting wrote:Doesn't Mormonism teach that there are five levels of heaven?
Telestial
Terrestrial
Celestial - three separate levels within it
liz3564 wrote:Yes, that is correct.


May I rephrase/update according to dictionaries I can read?
(You know, I am a miserable non-english-speaker)

The levels of heaven:
Three heavenly (=celestial) level, can be found in heaven - as other heavenly things.
One earthly (=terrestrial) level, can be found on Earth - as other earthly things.
One ????ly (=telestial) level, can be found in... can be found on... can be found at...

OK. I've found the place:
Image - or - Image
- Whenever a poet or preacher, chief or wizard spouts gibberish, the human race spends centuries deciphering the message. - Umberto Eco
- To assert that the earth revolves around the sun is as erroneous as to claim that Jesus was not born of a virgin. - Cardinal Bellarmine at the trial of Galilei
_gdemetz
_Emeritus
Posts: 1681
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2012 5:59 pm

Re: Why Do LDS Dismiss the Greater Part of the New Testament

Post by _gdemetz »

Yes, but what Paul was referring to were the three levels of heaven; namely the telestial, terrestrial, and the celestial. He was not referring to the subdivisions.
_ludwigm
_Emeritus
Posts: 10158
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 8:07 am

Re: Why Do LDS Dismiss the Greater Part of the New Testament

Post by _ludwigm »

gdemetz wrote:Yes, but what Paul was referring to were the three levels of heaven; namely the telestial, terrestrial, and the celestial. He was not referring to the subdivisions.

Which Paul? Osborne, our gracious Shulem?

The biblical Paul doesn't refer anything telestial.

FYI nobody in the Bible refers telestial.
- Whenever a poet or preacher, chief or wizard spouts gibberish, the human race spends centuries deciphering the message. - Umberto Eco
- To assert that the earth revolves around the sun is as erroneous as to claim that Jesus was not born of a virgin. - Cardinal Bellarmine at the trial of Galilei
_gdemetz
_Emeritus
Posts: 1681
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2012 5:59 pm

Re: Why Do LDS Dismiss the Greater Part of the New Testament

Post by _gdemetz »

I wasn't quoting Paul! I stated that he mentioned the third heaven! He didn't mention any subdivisions of the heavens!
_Drifting
_Emeritus
Posts: 7306
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 10:52 am

Re: Why Do LDS Dismiss the Greater Part of the New Testament

Post by _Drifting »

gdemetz wrote:I wasn't quoting Paul! I stated that he mentioned the third heaven! He didn't mention any subdivisions of the heavens!


Why didn't he?
Did he not know?
“We look to not only the spiritual but also the temporal, and we believe that a person who is impoverished temporally cannot blossom spiritually.”
Keith McMullin - Counsellor in Presiding Bishopric

"One, two, three...let's go shopping!"
Thomas S Monson - Prophet, Seer, Revelator
_gdemetz
_Emeritus
Posts: 1681
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2012 5:59 pm

Re: Why Do LDS Dismiss the Greater Part of the New Testament

Post by _gdemetz »

I don't know why he didn't. If I see him then I will ask him that.
_Drifting
_Emeritus
Posts: 7306
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 10:52 am

Re: Why Do LDS Dismiss the Greater Part of the New Testament

Post by _Drifting »

gdemetz wrote:I don't know why he didn't. If I see him then I will ask him that.


Perhaps he wasn't a Mormon...
“We look to not only the spiritual but also the temporal, and we believe that a person who is impoverished temporally cannot blossom spiritually.”
Keith McMullin - Counsellor in Presiding Bishopric

"One, two, three...let's go shopping!"
Thomas S Monson - Prophet, Seer, Revelator
Post Reply