Drifting wrote:So on the rainbow thread you denigrate Buffalo's Bible chronology because it's not from an official source, yet on this thread non official sources are okay for you to use....
That's hypocrisy!
no, clearly it is not. i denigrated buffalo's source because he specifically cites it as being "official" and thus proposes that as its source of validity. My unofficial citations are merely put forth as self-evident and i have not claimed they were "official" as a means to merit their authority or meaning. I have no objection to anyone using an unofficial source, except when they claim it to be an official source....that is actually more akin to "hypocrisy"
Seek freedom and become captive of your desires...seek discipline and find your liberty I can tell if a person is judgmental just by looking at them what is chaos to the fly is normal to the spider - morticia addams If you're not upsetting idiots, you might be an idiot. - Ted Nugent
Drifting wrote:So on the rainbow thread you denigrate Buffalo's Bible chronology because it's not from an official source, yet on this thread non official sources are okay for you to use....
That's hypocrisy!
no, clearly it is not. i denigrated buffalo's source because he specifically cites it as being "official" and thus proposes that as its source of validity. My unofficial citations are merely put forth as self-evident and i have not claimed they were "official" as a means to merit their authority or meaning. I have no objection to anyone using an unofficial source, except when they claim it to be an official source....that is actually more akin to "hypocrisy"
"http://LDS.org/legal/terms?lang=eng" wrote:
Licenses and Restrictions This site is owned and operated by Corporation of the President of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Buffalo's source was http://LDS.org/gospellibrary/materials/OT_Timeline_000.pdf
If "LDS.org", a site is owned and operated by Corporation of the President of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is not official, then what is?
- Whenever a poet or preacher, chief or wizard spouts gibberish, the human race spends centuries deciphering the message. - Umberto Eco - To assert that the earth revolves around the sun is as erroneous as to claim that Jesus was not born of a virgin. - Cardinal Bellarmine at the trial of Galilei
Drifting wrote:So on the rainbow thread you denigrate Buffalo's Bible chronology because it's not from an official source, yet on this thread non official sources are okay for you to use....
That's hypocrisy!
no, clearly it is not. i denigrated buffalo's source because he specifically cites it as being "official" and thus proposes that as its source of validity. My unofficial citations are merely put forth as self-evident and i have not claimed they were "official" as a means to merit their authority or meaning. I have no objection to anyone using an unofficial source, except when they claim it to be an official source....that is actually more akin to "hypocrisy"
My source was official, Corky.
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.
ludwigm wrote: Buffalo's source was http://LDS.org/gospellibrary/materials/OT_Timeline_000.pdf
If "LDS.org", a site is owned and operated by Corporation of the President of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is not official, then what is?
Don't mind subgenius. He's bitter and butthurt about being handed his ass six different ways in that thread. :D
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.
