I have to go with the scientific evidence that is most accurate when they conflict with each other. there were multiple migrations to the Americas. But migrations do not fit the terminology very well. There were multiple trans ocean voyages. To include a Polynesian, Australian, and most definitely a middle eastern voyage all three of those dna markers are found in the Americas. The middle east marker found among North American Indians. The dna evidence is supportive of some Asian haplo groups making it to the Americas via ocean voyages. Certain Asian haplogroups are missing in key areas to show a migration across a barren ice bridge. Some of the Asian haplo groups being absent are in modern day and paleo Eskimos. The biggest argument that once was against the Book of Mormon in terms of DNA is now its biggest defense ironic I know. What the problem is dna evidence conflicts with the dating of Haplo Group x and other Haplo groups, unless of course cave men were sailing across the oceans. Another example and mystery is that there was a migration to Australia 40000 years ago. Last time I checked Australia was an island. I’m going with the dna evidence its supported by cultural evidence. Scientist need to make the variables with radio carbon dating match up with cultural and dna evidence. They changed the first dating of Kennwick man by 3450 years. That same number used in the opposite direction falls well within the Book of Mormon timeline.
The Book of Mormon mentions three migrations to North America. For those voyages not mentioned in the Book of Mormon I think it’s safe to assume God had his hand in it. The Assyrian timeline falls within the Book of Mormon. What I found out recently is that Chief Joseph Cuneiform tablet specifically names the moon Goddess nanna. I wrote in my Hebrew and Cultural links that I believed the crescent shape objects found in prehistory archeological sites and worn by early Native Americans was an Assyrian moon God Sin. Doing more research sin was the incorrect god the correct god is the moon goddess Nanna. Chief Joseph had on his medicine bag an Assyrian star of Ashur. His medicine bag probably had the cuneiform tablet that mentions one of the gods they and their ancestors worshipped Nanna. Inna another god that Assyrians worshipped is on the Shawnee creek stone. The cultural and dna evidence all match up. It conflicts by thousands of years with current dating of middle eastern dna arrival to America.
bomgeography wrote:How did Arabians get to North America 10000 years ago.
what does that have to do with the Book of Mormon?
One of the Hopewell DNA markers is from the Middle East. It's the post you made fun of.
And which was debunked last month when you tried to use it. Like I said, what is your point here? Why bring up these sources that have been found lacking over and over and OVER?
The dna and archeological evidence shows that humans have been in the western hemisphere for at least 15k years. Where is the dating inconsistent?
The dna and archeological evidence shows that there were trans ocean voyages. That's inconsistent with 15k. Cave men if there were cave men were not sailing the oceans.
Cave men if there were cave men were not sailing the oceans.
really? "cave" men don't "sail oceans"? I'd love to see your reference for that.
Scientist do not believe cavemen sailed the oceans.
A caveman is a stock character based upon widespread but anachronistic and conflated concepts of the way in which neanderthals, early modern humans, or archaic hominins may have looked and behaved. The term originates out of assumptions about the association between early humans and caves, most clearly demonstrated in cave painting. The term is not used in academic research.