Spirituality or just emotion...?

The upper-crust forum for scholarly, polite, and respectful discussions only. Heavily moderated. Rated G.
Post Reply
_Themis
_Emeritus
Posts: 13426
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 6:43 pm

Re: Spirituality or just emotion...?

Post by _Themis »

jo1952 wrote:
Yet spiritual things can only be discerned spiritually; therefore, they cannot be discerned physically.


Spiritual experiences are a part of the physical world. It is an internal expereince, and as such cannot be shared other then through language. This is why physical evidence that can be shared is more valuable in trying to determine how things really are.

It's not that the spiritual is does not have value, it just that it dopes not tend to be reliable at telling us how things really are. This should be very evident to anyone objective enough to look around and see just how much people disagree about spiritual knowledge or interpretations.

Most of us desire that what is physical will prove something spiritual.


Not really. The physical is more reliable, so if it does not support an interpretation one gets from the spiritual, then it is less likely to be accurate.
42
_sheryl
_Emeritus
Posts: 144
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2011 6:31 am

Re: Spirituality or just emotion...?

Post by _sheryl »

Themis wrote:Lots of knowledge comes whether we want it or not. Just ask someone who is sent to jail.


You do not think that being sent to jail is a consequence of pursuing the desire that landed them there? Perhaps going to jail cannot be separated from a desire to act in a way that brings harm to others? And so the desire to know evil includes the desire to suffer the consequences, yes? Knowing evil must include how God's law - or the logos or word that is the impetus for creation and also sustains creation - responds to evil.

I think emotions can be quite complex, just as our brains are complex. This is why the spiritual experience may just be the creation of our minds. I am not suggesting that our thinking is separate from our emotions.


I agree. Spiritual experiences are a creation of our mind, as is all that we perceive. You know that the eyes only perceive light and send messages to the brain about the light that is perceived, the mind then gives images to the light? Sight is a creation of the mind. And likewise spiritual experiences are created out of the mind in response to both inner and outer stimuli. Yes, a spiritual experience can, and most do, come from a higher part of ourselves. In many of the visions of the Bible, the person seeing was seeing a higher aspect of themselves. Kul eh?

Trust is a good description, but on many things we do not need to trust or have faith. We can find out for ourselves. Certainly many things I will have faith that they are true, but they tend to be things not that important to believe one way or the other. I can have faith the church is what it claims to be or I can look at the evidence and see if it supports it or not. The evidence clearly does not, so it is very unlikely that the church is what it claims to be. Now I cannot know this in an absolute way, and I am comfortable with that. I am not interested in some God who is going to punish those who think and reason over those who just have faith.


Indeed you trust the evidence that you have received given the invalidity of the LDS Church. Thus your conclusion regarding evidence you have received in this case, as in all situations, comes from your faith or belief or trust in the evidence.

The are interrelated. One can test a scientific theory they are learning by testing it, which is witnessing and experiencing it.


Yes, I too see witnessing and experiencing as interrelated.



We certainly do not define knowing the same.


Yes, this is what makes me a Gnostic. I do not believe that being told about another person's knowing or told what they know is true knowing. We have to experience or perceive for ourselves to truly know. Spiritually this would mean to experience Gnosis.

This is why shared experiences are better then internal ones in regards to knowing how things most likely are. I don;'t think you or I have any idea of early Christianity and what they may have thought and believed.


"Shared' yes is the best. But if we have not been a part of the internal knowing, then we really don't know. And all shared experiences are perceived different, simply because we are all different.



I agree on your past is no different then a dream last night. This again is why shared expereinces are superior here.


Yes, I agree.






I can say this is certainly not correct. If true then this would be a very different world.

No one. We experience and test to see what works, the idea being that what works is probably a good enough representation of things as they really are. I try try all I want to believe I can fly, but I hope you don't think it a good idea to try flying off a cliff. :)


Really? What do people really desire? And what are the consequences of that desire? Is this not what we experience every day? I can share about the inner worlds and how they are all connected, and how this world is a product of the collective desire of humanity, but I don't think you would believe me, that is until you experience it for yourself.

Gnostics have a saying, be careful what you think today, for that will become your tomorrow.



Not really. It usually depends on how they act as well. If someone says they saw an angel, I don't necessarily think they are insane any more then someone who says they were abducted by aliens. Many things could explain their expereince that don't involve seeing real angels or aliens, or they could really have seen that angel/alien.

I think reality is Independent of what we think or perceive.


Is this provable?

Shalom!

Sheryl
_Themis
_Emeritus
Posts: 13426
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 6:43 pm

Re: Spirituality or just emotion...?

Post by _Themis »

sheryl wrote:
You do not think that being sent to jail is a consequence of pursuing the desire that landed them there?


Irrelevant to what i said, which is that they had no desire to learn certain knowledge they will undoubtedly be learning from being forced into jail.

I agree. Spiritual experiences are a creation of our mind, as is all that we perceive. You know that the eyes only perceive light and send messages to the brain about the light that is perceived, the mind then gives images to the light? Sight is a creation of the mind. And likewise spiritual experiences are created out of the mind in response to both inner and outer stimuli. Yes, a spiritual experience can, and most do, come from a higher part of ourselves. In many of the visions of the Bible, the person seeing was seeing a higher aspect of themselves. Kul eh?


The big difference is what is sharable. We go by what works, and things that are shareable, we tend to have much more agreement on.

Indeed you trust the evidence that you have received given the invalidity of the LDS Church. Thus your conclusion regarding evidence you have received in this case, as in all situations, comes from your faith or belief or trust in the evidence.


You can check things out for yourself easily enough. Scientific facts can be checked out yourself. You may notice that in university science classes usually have labs with them. This is so one can go through many of the experiments themselves to confirm how it works, and that it does work. Now I don't know Egyptian, but then no egyptoligists, including LDS ones, is disputing that the papyri does not translate into the Book of Abraham. There are plenty of ways to evaluate evidence without using much faith in it's validity.

Yes, this is what makes me a Gnostic. I do not believe that being told about another person's knowing or told what they know is true knowing. We have to experience or perceive for ourselves to truly know. Spiritually this would mean to experience Gnosis.


Every expereince has to be interpreted. I don't question the experience, but whether the interpretation is accurate. When it comes to the spiritual it is all over the place, and agreement about what it means is not really there.

"Shared' yes is the best. But if we have not been a part of the internal knowing, then we really don't know. And all shared experiences are perceived different, simply because we are all different.


Not just perception, but interpretation, which is hugely affected by our environment. LDS tend to interpret it according to LDS beliefs. Same for other religious groups. I think it is very unrealistic to think each group as a whole is having very different expereinces, but certainly very different interpretations. To me this suggest that most if not all interpretations are probably not accurate.

Really? What do people really desire? And what are the consequences of that desire? Is this not what we experience every day?

Gnostics have a saying, be careful what you think today, for that will become your tomorrow.


I am not talking about the influence our thoughts have on our life, but your idea that reality is what ever we think it is. If this was true, then this world would be every different. There are many things beyond our control or influence.

I can share about the inner worlds and how they are all connected, and how this world is a product of the collective desire of humanity, but I don't think you would believe me, that is until you experience it for yourself.


This assumes that if I have had the same experience I would have the same interpretation.

Is this provable?


Angels, aliens or reality independent of of what we think or perceive.

I would say yes to all. The past is the key to reality. There are many things that were not perceived or thought of, but were later found to exist, and had existed the whole time. I think this is good evidence that there are things we yet to learn about or have knowledge about. Maybe after many thousands of years of not finding anything new then maybe start thinking we know it all. :)
42
_sheryl
_Emeritus
Posts: 144
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2011 6:31 am

Re: Spirituality or just emotion...?

Post by _sheryl »

Themis wrote:Irrelevant to what i said, which is that they had no desire to learn certain knowledge they will undoubtedly be learning from being forced into jail.


The big difference is what is sharable. We go by what works, and things that are shareable, we tend to have much more agreement on.


You can check things out for yourself easily enough. Scientific facts can be checked out yourself. You may notice that in university science classes usually have labs with them. This is so one can go through many of the experiments themselves to confirm how it works, and that it does work. Now I don't know Egyptian, but then no egyptoligists, including LDS ones, is disputing that the papyri does not translate into the Book of Abraham. There are plenty of ways to evaluate evidence without using much faith in it's validity.


Every expereince has to be interpreted. I don't question the experience, but whether the interpretation is accurate. When it comes to the spiritual it is all over the place, and agreement about what it means is not really there.


Not just perception, but interpretation, which is hugely affected by our environment. LDS tend to interpret it according to LDS beliefs. Same for other religious groups. I think it is very unrealistic to think each group as a whole is having very different expereinces, but certainly very different interpretations. To me this suggest that most if not all interpretations are probably not accurate.


I am not talking about the influence our thoughts have on our life, but your idea that reality is what ever we think it is. If this was true, then this world would be every different. There are many things beyond our control or influence.



This assumes that if I have had the same experience I would have the same interpretation.


Angels, aliens or reality independent of of what we think or perceive.

I would say yes to all. The past is the key to reality. There are many things that were not perceived or thought of, but were later found to exist, and had existed the whole time. I think this is good evidence that there are things we yet to learn about or have knowledge about. Maybe after many thousands of years of not finding anything new then maybe start thinking we know it all. :)


Hi Themis!

If I could add two thoughts that are interconnected. One is a lack of understanding of our desires and what they invoke. A simple picture might help. Suppose I desire to play in the freeway. I want to run and skip and do cartwheels in the same place that cars are speeding by at 70 mph. Perhaps I don't even see the cars, or don't think that they could hurt me. Maybe I believe I am faster than the cars. When a car hits me and kills me, others will think what a fool! Her desire to do something foolish brought about her death. Even if it was ignorance on my part, it was still brought around by my desire to do something that would result in my death.

This is what I am saying about doing evil. When we seek after a self alone desire it is like we are playing in the freeway, even if we are ignorant to this reality. Just because we cannot see the freeway or the cars does not make it unreal. When we eventually learn about the unseeable freeway and cars we will stop doing evil, in some life, at some time. This is the purpose of the law.

Those who fill our prisons suffer from ignorance. They can't see the consequences. Actually, I took a criminology class in college that taught that most criminals do not have the developed ability to see into the future, to judge consequences, they can only see the right now. So the threat of jail does not hinder their desire to do harm. But their ignorance does not make them free from consequences, just like our ignorance does not make us free from consequences. This is the evolution, the learning of the soul, to learn about consequences, to learn what we are really desiring.

I think we agree that for those in jail, their ignorance regarding what they are desiring landed them in jail. I offer that the same applies to our doing evil. There are consequences which flow from our desire. Which are part of our desire. I mean can't you see someone saying to a criminal: Why are you robbing a bank? Do you want to go to jail? Because in my reality, wanting to rob a bank is equivalent to wanting to go to jail.

The other thing I would offer is this:

Ecclesiastes 1
9 That which has been is what will be,
That which is done is what will be done,
And there is nothing new under the sun.
10 Is there anything of which it may be said,
“See, this is new”?
It has already been in ancient times before us.


1 Corinthians 2:9
Eye has not seen, nor ear heard,
Nor have entered into the heart of man
The things which God has prepared for those who love Him.


As you said there is nothing new. According to what man can perceive and create out of his own mind. The spiritual realms are not comprehendable, imaginable to the human mind whose experiencing can only be gifted out of Grace. And so with regards to the spiritual, we are talking of something that is beyond man and his reason and logic. We are talking of something new.

And there is a shared experience of this new. It is not among the masses though. Only very few among humanity have evolved to the point of being able receive these gifts of spirit, of Godself, to enter into such experiences. But there are some, and though there are uniquenesses there is indeed a sharing of experience occurring. When our spiritual senses begin to awaken (and our desire for them to awaken can hasten this) we will be led to make contact, we will be driven compelled to make contact with those sharing in the same experiences. And so among these, all this is shared and proven.

Such individuals will speak to the masses, having learned from much experience, and share that if we desire to see and to know what is new, it will be opened to us. Seek and we will find, knock and it will be opened up to us.

It is all according to our desire. Our entire display of life! We are invited to step out of ignorance into true knowing.

Shalom!

Sheryl
_Franktalk
_Emeritus
Posts: 2689
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 1:28 am

Re: Spirituality or just emotion...?

Post by _Franktalk »

Sheryl,

That was a very nice post. Your portrayal of the unseen was excellent. We are indeed surrounded by unseen beings and things, an entire alternative reality. How many layers are not known to me. I would not be surprised to find out it is nearly infinite. It is not easy for me to get my head around a power that large. I do believe that this universe is so big so we have a measuring stick in a sense for us to measure the power of God. But one line in scripture is very telling.

Gen 1:16 And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also.

He stretched out the heavens, one day I wish to see this happen. I too will sing for joy as the angels did.

Job 38:7 When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy?
_Buffalo
_Emeritus
Posts: 12064
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:33 pm

Re: Spirituality or just emotion...?

Post by _Buffalo »

Franktalk wrote:We are indeed surrounded by unseen beings and things, an entire alternative reality.


CFR
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.

B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
_Themis
_Emeritus
Posts: 13426
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 6:43 pm

Re: Spirituality or just emotion...?

Post by _Themis »

sheryl wrote:
Hi Themis!

If I could add two thoughts that are interconnected. One is a lack of understanding of our desires and what they invoke. A simple picture might help. Suppose I desire to play in the freeway. I want to run and skip and do cartwheels in the same place that cars are speeding by at 70 mph. Perhaps I don't even see the cars, or don't think that they could hurt me. Maybe I believe I am faster than the cars. When a car hits me and kills me, others will think what a fool! Her desire to do something foolish brought about her death. Even if it was ignorance on my part, it was still brought around by my desire to do something that would result in my death.

This is what I am saying about doing evil. When we seek after a self alone desire it is like we are playing in the freeway, even if we are ignorant to this reality. Just because we cannot see the freeway or the cars does not make it unreal. When we eventually learn about the unseeable freeway and cars we will stop doing evil, in some life, at some time. This is the purpose of the law.


This supports my idea of reality being independent of our abilities to perceive it all. I made no comments about consequences, but certainly agree that consequences are a result of our actions, and of course can provide knowledge we did not seek for or desired. .
Those who fill our prisons suffer from ignorance. They can't see the consequences. Actually, I took a criminology class in college that taught that most criminals do not have the developed ability to see into the future, to judge consequences, they can only see the right now. So the threat of jail does not hinder their desire to do harm. But their ignorance does not make them free from consequences, just like our ignorance does not make us free from consequences. This is the evolution, the learning of the soul, to learn about consequences, to learn what we are really desiring.

I think we agree that for those in jail, their ignorance regarding what they are desiring landed them in jail. I offer that the same applies to our doing evil. There are consequences which flow from our desire. Which are part of our desire. I mean can't you see someone saying to a criminal: Why are you robbing a bank? Do you want to go to jail? Because in my reality, wanting to rob a bank is equivalent to wanting to go to jail.


I only used jail as an example of people who have no emotions or desires for certain knowledge that they will get without any desire to learn it.

As you said there is nothing new. According to what man can perceive and create out of his own mind. The spiritual realms are not comprehendable, imaginable to the human mind whose experiencing can only be gifted out of Grace. And so with regards to the spiritual, we are talking of something that is beyond man and his reason and logic. We are talking of something new.


Since we do not know what all the mind is capable of producing, I think it is incorrect to jump to this conclusion. I wonder of this is why some attribute it to a higher being.

And there is a shared experience of this new. It is not among the masses though. Only very few among humanity have evolved to the point of being able receive these gifts of spirit, of Godself, to enter into such experiences.


I know hallucinations can sometimes be shared. I assume you do not include yourself in this group that is having this shared expereince.

But there are some, and though there are uniquenesses there is indeed a sharing of experience occurring.


Could you be more clear in how the expereince is shared?

When our spiritual senses begin to awaken (and our desire for them to awaken can hasten this) we will be led to make contact, we will be driven compelled to make contact with those sharing in the same experiences. And so among these, all this is shared and proven.


Be careful here. Many in different groups make this mistake. We tend to gravitate towards those who think and believe like we do. That is natural, but we can come to jump to some conclusions that are not warranted. If someone is interpreting their expereinces a certain way, they will tend to gravitate towards others or groups that have similar interpretations.

Such individuals will speak to the masses, having learned from much experience, and share that if we desire to see and to know what is new, it will be opened to us. Seek and we will find, knock and it will be opened up to us.


While I agree with this to a certain point, we also need to be careful here as well. It can be easy to see what we want. Our minds like to give us what we want, or at least create what we want.

Edit: I would add that many like frank may be good example of seeing and believing what they want. I also think many of our spiritual expereinces are created by the mind to give us what we seek.
42
_Franktalk
_Emeritus
Posts: 2689
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 1:28 am

Re: Spirituality or just emotion...?

Post by _Franktalk »

Buffalo wrote:
Franktalk wrote:We are indeed surrounded by unseen beings and things, an entire alternative reality.


CFR


I have a personal witness. You are free to look all of this up in scripture. But since you place an agenda before you I fear you will see little.
_Buffalo
_Emeritus
Posts: 12064
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:33 pm

Re: Spirituality or just emotion...?

Post by _Buffalo »

Franktalk wrote:
Buffalo wrote:
CFR


I have a personal witness. You are free to look all of this up in scripture. But since you place an agenda before you I fear you will see little.


Do you have any hard evidence to back up your claims? Some people have a personal witness of fairies.
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.

B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
_Franktalk
_Emeritus
Posts: 2689
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 1:28 am

Re: Spirituality or just emotion...?

Post by _Franktalk »

Themis wrote:Edit: I would add that many like frank may be good example of seeing and believing what they want. I also think many of our spiritual expereinces are created by the mind to give us what we seek.


Do you think that you have an open mind? So tell me is the gathering of the Jews in Israel after two thousand years a vision or did it happen? If it happened was it because someone two thousand years ago predicted it? Or was it a coincidence? Now please list for me how many nations of people were scattered around the world and came back together after two thousand years? How strong are your feelings that a passage in the Bible are just words on a page? Since you must have studied me in order to form an educated opinion of my mind set please tell me what drives me to see things that are not there? To what end is my mind making visions for me to see? Please share the depth of your understanding.
Post Reply