Themis wrote:Could you provide more detail? I know it is not as simple as you are putting it.
http://maxwellinstitute.BYU.edu/publica ... ts/?id=126
Themis wrote:Quite the opposite. Many religious leaders learn and use emotions/feelings to gain adherents.
Being gullible is not a condition I'm trying to address.
Themis wrote:We all interpret our experiences. At one time we interpreted it as the HG. Now we don't, although most of us needed other evidences to change beliefs regardless LDS truth claims.
If you have to "interpret" your experience, you've never seen God.
Themis wrote:... The LDS teachs that one will not get their answer from seeing or hearing God directly, but through the HG. I seriously doubt you were ever very active in the LDS church and would not know this stuff.
I seriously doubt you were ever a Mormon or a missionary. We often start with Joseph Smith first vision. He didn't feel the HG was near. HE SAW GOD. It seems you missed the point of the discusssions. Joseph Smith sets the bar and you settled for "I feel it is true". Weren't you paying attention?
Themis wrote:You do not understand. People believe certain things usually not becuase they are true, but because they believe they are true. As such, people can change their minds for various reasons. Your criticisms really are aimed not just at former believers, but at a minimum the vast majority of believing members who have never had God or angels talk to them. I assume then you believe that God has talked to you?
I understand just fine. My criticisms are aimed at all those who do not truely know God or have experienced God in any way and cannot be bothered to seek God. Mormons who do not bothered to truely seek the Lord are simply ex-mormons in waiting. They are fooling themselves and everyone around them and living a lie. Either you know it is true or you don't. It is pretty cut-and-dried.