Published UK Financial Accounts 2011 - highlights.

[_subgenius]

Subby, you do not need to 'see' the evidence. Just ponder it out in your heart, then pray to know if you are right. Simples.

once again we see your cursory knowledge ooze to the surface.
we are also to "study it out" and gather as much information as possible.
The notion that we are just solely to "ponder it out in your heart" is not a correct one form you - as we have often discovered you have little actual knowledge of the church and its teachings.

[_Drifting]

Subby, you do not need to 'see' the evidence. Just ponder it out in your heart, then pray to know if you are right. Simples.

once again we see your cursory knowledge ooze to the surface.
we are also to "study it out" and gather as much information as possible.
The notion that we are just solely to "ponder it out in your heart" is not a correct one form you - as we have often discovered you have little actual knowledge of the church and its teachings.

And I've shown you exactly where you can verify the information and see the last three years worth of Church accounts for the UK. Which, seemingly you do not wish to do, preferring instead to keep your head firmly rammed down into the sand.

http://www.companieshouse.gov.uk

Simples!

[_subgenius]

And I've shown you exactly where you can verify the information and see the last three years worth of Church accounts for the UK. Which, seemingly you do not wish to do, preferring instead to keep your head firmly rammed down into the sand.

http://www.companieshouse.gov.uk

Simples!

"i have got the proof right here on my desk!"

again, no link provided to your specific claims

Simple-est!

[_Drifting]

And I've shown you exactly where you can verify the information and see the last three years worth of Church accounts for the UK. Which, seemingly you do not wish to do, preferring instead to keep your head firmly rammed down into the sand.

http://www.companieshouse.gov.uk

Simples!

"i have got the proof right here on my desk!"

again, no link provided to your specific claims

Simple-est!

No, not my desk. A government website, available to the public.

[_subgenius]

No, not my desk. A government website, available to the public.

i found none of the information you have "cited" at the link you provided, because it is not there.
do you have an actual link to prove what you claim, or is "Google it yourself" now your standard response to any and all CFR?

[_Drifting]

No, not my desk. A government website, available to the public.

i found none of the information you have "cited" at the link you provided, because it is not there.
do you have an actual link to prove what you claim, or is "Google it yourself" now your standard response to any and all CFR?

Here's some advice: disbelieve me. Disbelieve everything I post. Assume it's all lies.

[_subgenius]

Here's some advice: disbelieve me. Disbelieve everything I post. Assume it's all lies.

well, that seems tantrum like.
Understand that it is not that i "disbelieve" you...it is just that I, like you, can not be expected to consider something as "true" without any evidence.

[_Drifting]

Here's some advice: disbelieve me. Disbelieve everything I post. Assume it's all lies.

well, that seems tantrum like.
Understand that it is not that i "disbelieve" you...it is just that I, like you, can not be expected to consider something as "true" without any evidence.

I agree, don't consider it 'true'.

[_subgenius]

Understand that it is not that i "disbelieve" you...it is just that I, like you, can not be expected to consider something as "true" without any evidence.

I agree, don't consider it 'true'.

Ok, then we are in agreement, your OP is not expected to be considered as true.

Since your expectation is no longer existent then why is this thread still here?

By what justification would you post something that you, admittedly, do not expect can be considered as true?

[_PrickKicker]

Ok, then we are in agreement, your OP is not expected to be considered as true.

Since your expectation is no longer existent then why is this thread still here?

By what justification would you post something that you, admittedly, do not expect can be considered as true?

Twisting words to suit you, your spiritual interpretor needs calibrating.

I take it that, Drifting is claiming that the reports are genuine, but the figures have been falsified. therefore untrue.