LittleNipper wrote:I can say that people, "including professionals" can and do take some things for granted.
Then why did you link to a site that accuses scientists of destroying evidence of humans and dinosaurs living together?
LittleNipper wrote:There is no indication of what the population of man was at the time of the Flood.
Yes there is. There are a great many indicia of the size of human populations in the last ten thousand years.
LittleNipper wrote:There may only have been a few hundred, a thousand a million, or a billion. There is no honest way to actually know.
See above.
LittleNipper wrote:According to the Bible, Noah had only three sons and he was 600 years old when the Flood happened.
There's a term for this: mythology.
LittleNipper wrote:There is every likelihood that meteors and asteroids hit the earth as a part of the Flood.
Sure, there's plenty of proof of impact events, but there's no proof of a world-wide flood.
LittleNipper wrote:So if man mostly lived together, one direct hit would have consumed them.
See above.
LittleNipper wrote:There is some logic to the idea that a "modern" human fossil would likely be considered out of place if found around dino by an evolutionist. And another reality is that man would likely not live around dinosaurs for obvious reason ----- one of which being the mess such creatures would make of crops (at the very least). They may have lived continents apart.
Then why did you link to a site that accuses scientists of destroying evidence of humans and dinosaurs living together?
LittleNipper wrote:We can not know how many dinosaurs there were at the time of the Flood.
Yes we can. The number of non-avian dinosaurs that lived between 4,000 and 6,000 BCE was zero.
LittleNipper wrote:The shear size of some of them likely helped in forming fossils a lot easier than say smaller delectate mammals.
Wrong--microfossils outnumber macrofossils by many orders of magnitude.
HINT: it helps if you have a microscope if you want to see microfossils.
LittleNipper wrote:Did all dinosaurs form fossils? Who knows? 1 in 2, 1 in 10, 1 in 100? Who can say with real honest precision.
See above.
LittleNipper wrote:Uniformitarians have been concocting their theories for far longer than Creationists. In fact, it seems that believers simply accepted the Bible as fact and ignored the reality that there were a growing number of individuals working on theories for at least 100 years before "Creationism" became even labeled as such. The motivator was the 1963 Supreme Court decision against sponsored prayer and Bible reading as a scholastic encouragement of public education.
Wrong--the Bible out dates the scientific method by several thousand years.
LittleNipper wrote:Christian institutions basically handed the science departments over to uniformitarians and evolutionists for years because they believed that faith in the Bible was important and not proof. When seemingly overnight the Judeo/Christian Biblical institution was thrown out of Community public school that community lost much of its interaction. And public education which was once the champion of Biblical consideration, suddenly was at odds with the Church.
Sounds like cause for celebration!
LittleNipper wrote:I tell you this because you seem under the notion that there is no proof for the Flood. The reality is that no one was fervently researching for any until about 50 years ago. And by that time such research and investigation was considered religious in nature. It as almost too late....................
Your problem here is that you don't know the difference between "proof" and "evidence". This is a common mistake among scientifically illiterate individuals such as yourself.
