What proof is there that the hammer doesn't belong to Thor?LittleNipper wrote:The Erotic Apologist wrote:Here's another example of a Christian using deception to propagate his beliefs--Dr. Carl Baugh falsely claims this 19th Century hammer (below) is an antediluvian artifact. It's on display in his "Creationism Evidence Museum" in Texas.
What proof is there that the hammer is not old?
No, I didn't say it's a fake. I'm reasonably certain it's a real hammer.LittleNipper wrote:You say it is a fake.
No--it's not a modern hammer. It was forged at some point during the 19th Century.LittleNipper wrote:Is it a fake because it looks like a modern hammer?
This isn't an ancient hammer. (See above.)LittleNipper wrote:What should an ancient hammer look like?
Is that why he decided the Jews needed to be wiped out?LittleNipper wrote:Martin Luther was beside himself as to why a sect of people could not believe Jesus to be the Messiah.
And what exactly is a "sect of people"? Is that like a gaggle of geese? Or a murder of crows?
Is that why he decided the Jews needed to be wiped out?LittleNipper wrote:Their temple was gone (prophetically biblical).
Is that why he decided the Jews needed to be wiped out?LittleNipper wrote:They don't sacrifice as they are commanded to do (prophetically biblical).
That is a blatant falsehood, nipper.LittleNipper wrote:You hate Christians and Creationists...
No, I don't; only the ones who use deception to propagate their beliefs.LittleNipper wrote:...you call them all liars, etc. etc....
No--unlike Martin Luther, I'm not a genocidal Antisemite.LittleNipper wrote:Are you in the same boat a Martin Luther or are you exempt?
Too easy. It's wrong and unscientific to the extent and to the degree to which it derives its core hypothesis from the Bible.LittleNipper wrote:Prove this is wrong and unscientific: http://www.earthage.org/EarthOldorYoung ... _flood.htm