LittleNipper wrote:I am of the opinion that Lyell was anything but a Christian. At the best Hutton was a Deist
If so, good for him. That's better than being a fanatical, dogmatic, and intolerant Christian fundamentalist.
LittleNipper wrote:I am of the opinion that Lyell was anything but a Christian. At the best Hutton was a Deist
No, what is the value if one gains the whole world but loses his soul. Being fanatical or dogmatic is certainly not limited to "Christians", or even to what could be described as a "religious person". Doctors of scientific theory can be just as fanatical and dogmatic concerning their OWN fields of study. Billions of years become absolutes and consideration of God systematically shunned as "unscientific".Gunnar wrote:LittleNipper wrote:I am of the opinion that Lyell was anything but a Christian. At the best Hutton was a Deist
If so, good for him. That's better than being a fanatical, dogmatic, and intolerant Christian fundamentalist.
huckelberry wrote:I wonder if this signals the end of the fossil discussion, or just an abridgment of it?
Actually I thought Nippers quote was appropriate. Perhaps because I see that scripture as making more sense than the goofy idea that natural disasters are all Gods judgements on some poor saps.
Perhaps the Romans passage is a bit richer in context where in creation waits in eager expectation of the appearance of the sons of God.
The Erotic Apologist wrote:
Actions cause reactions.The Erotic Apologist wrote:huckelberry wrote:I wonder if this signals the end of the fossil discussion, or just an abridgment of it?
Actually I thought Nippers quote was appropriate. Perhaps because I see that scripture as making more sense than the goofy idea that natural disasters are all Gods judgements on some poor saps.
Perhaps the Romans passage is a bit richer in context where in creation waits in eager expectation of the appearance of the sons of God.
I think Nipper quoted that scripture because he believes the entire universe is "groaning under the weight of sin," as if sin has mass and is subject to gravitational attraction.
LittleNipper wrote:Actions cause reactions.The Erotic Apologist wrote:I think Nipper quoted that scripture because he believes the entire universe is "groaning under the weight of sin," as if sin has mass and is subject to gravitational attraction.
The Erotic Apologist wrote:huckelberry wrote:I wonder if this signals the end of the fossil discussion, or just an abridgment of it?
I think Nipper quoted that scripture because he believes the entire universe is "groaning under the weight of sin," as if sin has mass and is subject to gravitational attraction.
huckelberry wrote:I think Apologist is working out a sociological test to create a scale of degrees of purity of literal scripture interpretation. Who can reach a pure ten?