Bible verse by verse

The upper-crust forum for scholarly, polite, and respectful discussions only. Heavily moderated. Rated G.
Post Reply
_LittleNipper
_Emeritus
Posts: 4518
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:49 pm

Re: Bible verse by verse

Post by _LittleNipper »

spotlight wrote:How well does this "model" of animal kinds on board the ark diversifying during the first 200 years after the flood stack up? The opossum shows little change over millions of years. The Cretaceous opossum of 70 million years ago–which most young-earth creationists would classify as pre-Flood because the fossils are found in strata they classify as Flood deposits–is very much like the opossum of today. Such continuous series of similar fossils tells us no divergence has occurred. This indicates the opossum and other species experienced fairly uniform conditions before and after the Flood.
http://www.reasons.org/articles/rapid-p ... arth-model

Facts disproving fantasy. :eek:


Most of the dog breeds can be attributed to the last 200 years. The opossum seems to be one of those animals that varied little since created by GOD approx. 6000 years ago. It only means the opossum was a well adapted creature.
_LittleNipper
_Emeritus
Posts: 4518
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:49 pm

Re: Bible verse by verse

Post by _LittleNipper »

Maksutov wrote:
LittleNipper wrote:The Fact is that YOU do not believe in an ALMIGHTY, ALL POWERFUL, GOD. You believe in a man of flesh and bone who was good enough to become just another among many gods. This is not what the Bible illustrates. You believe that Creationists are totally wrong but evolutionists and uniformitarians are right on the mark!!!

However, There was a World Wide Flood and a man named NOAH. Jesus the Messiah affirmed it.
Matthew 24:37
New International Version
As it was in the days of Noah, so it will be at the coming of the Son of Man.

And it would seem that you and the evolutionists are missing the boat.


So, Nipper, you think that shouting at us will convince us? About as much as that street preacher on the corner with his spittly sermons at sinners passing by. I can't help it if your God doesn't exist. Don't yell at me about it, he's your problem. :rolleyes: There are many Christians who disagree with how you interpret your book. You have an argument with them as well. Please try not to burn any at the stake, no matter what your book says. :lol:

So, you are one of those silly people who don't care what you say or how you say it, but actually think it's terrible to type in caps because you imagine that represents yelling! Prove God doesn't exist. Create biological life. Show that evil deeds go unpunished. There is no safety in numbers. P>S. The Bible NEVER promoted burning at the stake. That was introduced by pagans who burnt babies as sacrafices, and torched those they didn't like.

But speaking of rude, what is really rude is trying to disrupt a threat with opinions and interruptive conversations which are TOTALLY unrelated to that thread. :ugeek:
_spotlight
_Emeritus
Posts: 1702
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2013 1:44 am

Re: Bible verse by verse

Post by _spotlight »

LittleNipper wrote:Most of the dog breeds can be attributed to the last 200 years. The opossum seems to be one of those animals that varied little since created by GOD approx. 6000 years ago. It only means the opossum was a well adapted creature.


Well the Opossums are not alone in this respect:

Aardvark (Orycteropus afer)
Amami rabbit (Pentalagus furnessi)[17]
Chevrotain (Tragulidae)[citation needed]
Elephant shrew (Macroscelidea)[citation needed]
Laotian rock rat (Laonastes aenigmamus)[citation needed]
Monito del monte (Dromiciops gliroides)
Monotremes (the platypus and echidna)
Mountain beaver (Aplodontia rufa)
Okapi (Okapia johnstoni)[18]
Opossums (Didelphidae)
Capybara (Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris)[citation needed]
Red panda (Ailurus fulgens)[citation needed]
Solenodon (Solenodon cubanus and Solenodon paradoxus)
Shrew opossum (Caenolestidae)
Pelicans have been virtually unchanged since the Eocene, and are noted to have been even more conservative across the Cenozoic than crocodiles[21]
Acanthisittidae (New Zealand "wrens") – 2 living species, a few more recently extinct. Distinct lineage of Passeriformes.
Broad-billed sapayoa (Sapayoa aenigma) – One living species. Distinct lineage of Tyranni.
Bearded reedling (Panurus biarmicus) – One living species. Distinct lineage of Passerida or Sylvioidea.
Coliiformes (mousebirds) – 6 living species in 2 genera. Distinct lineage of Neoaves.
Hoatzin (Ophisthocomus hoazin) – One living species. Distinct lineage of Neoaves.
Magpie goose (Anseranas semipalmata) – One living species. Distinct lineage of Anseriformes.
Seriema (Cariamidae) – 2 living species. Distinct lineage Cariamae.
Tinamiformes (tinamous) 50 living species Distinct Lineage Palaeognathae
Alligator snapping turtle (Macrochelys temminckii)
Crocodilia (crocodiles, gavials, caimans and alligators)
Pig-nosed turtle (Carettochelys insculpta)
Snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentina)
Tuatara (Sphenodon punctatus and Sphenodon guntheri)
Giant salamanders (Cryptobranchus and Andrias)
Hula painted frog (Latonia nigriventer)[22]
Purple frog (Nasikabatrachus sahyadrensis)
Mantophasmatodea (gladiators; a few living species)
Meropeidae (3 living species, 4 extinct)
Micromalthus debilis (a beetle)
Mymarommatid wasps (10 living species in genus Palaeomymar)
Nevrorthidae (3 species-poor genera)
Nothomyrmecia (known as the dinosaur ant)
Notiothauma reedi (a scorpionfly relative)
Orussidae (parasitic wood wasps; about 70 living species in 16 genera)
Peloridiidae (peloridiid bugs; fewer than 30 living species in 13 genera)
Sikhotealinia zhiltzovae (a jurodid beetle)
Syntexis libocedrii (Anaxyelidae cedar wood wasp)
Liphistiidae (trapdoor spiders)
Onychophorans (velvet worms)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_fossil
Kolob’s set time is “one thousand years according to the time appointed unto that whereon thou standest” (Abraham 3:4). I take this as a round number. - Gee
_spotlight
_Emeritus
Posts: 1702
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2013 1:44 am

Re: Bible verse by verse

Post by _spotlight »

LittleNipper presented material showing how different chimps were from humans and therefore we could not be related due to this difference. But look at these animals that are more different from one another than a chimp is from a human that he attributes to a common ancestor on board of the ark of Noah:

I didn’t show the numbers for chimps compared to great apes and orangutans but the differences (<2000 differences) are much greater than the differences between humans and chimps. However, creationists who study “kinds” have placed all the great apes in a single “holobaramin.”

Look at the red fox and dog/wolf comparison. Here we see a whopping 2269 differences. This is close to double the differences that we find between chimps and human mtDNA genomes. Remember that many creationists wish to claim that foxes and wolves are part of the same holobaramin which means they all share a common ancestor.

The lion and tiger, which are poster species for creationists who say that evolution has happened within kinds, have 1373 differences. This is almost the same as the number of differences between humans and chimpanzees.

Look at the domesticated cat and cheetah – 1765 differences. Can creationists really claim that all these cats are actually related to a single common ancestor and probably had a single mtDNA sequence just 4000 years ago but then claim that the genetic difference between chimps and humans is so vast that it is ridiculous to think they had a common ancestor.

Look at the other bear species, especially, the Panda bear comparisons. Some are far more different from one another than the chimp and human sequences.

Sheep and goats are almost universally proclaimed by creationists to represent the same “kind” and yet again we see again that these two taxa have as many differences as humans and chimps.


https://thenaturalhistorian.com/2013/02 ... -compared/ :surprised:
Kolob’s set time is “one thousand years according to the time appointed unto that whereon thou standest” (Abraham 3:4). I take this as a round number. - Gee
_LittleNipper
_Emeritus
Posts: 4518
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:49 pm

Re: Bible verse by verse

Post by _LittleNipper »

?
_spotlight
_Emeritus
Posts: 1702
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2013 1:44 am

Re: Bible verse by verse

Post by _spotlight »

LittleNipper wrote:Most breeds of dogs are the result of design inspired human manipulated mating over the last 200 years. The same is true among horses, cattle, and domestic cats.

Dogs are genetically closer to one another than are humans and chimps by the way. So there goes your argument again right down the drain. Human breeding cannot affect a very great change in the genome in 200 years time.

The problem remains. Humans and chimps are closer genetically than animals that are supposed to have descended from the same "kind" on board the ark.

Oooops, LittleNipper pulled his last rebuttal. Did he see his mistake?
Kolob’s set time is “one thousand years according to the time appointed unto that whereon thou standest” (Abraham 3:4). I take this as a round number. - Gee
_Maksutov
_Emeritus
Posts: 12480
Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 8:19 pm

Re: Bible verse by verse

Post by _Maksutov »

LittleNipper wrote:
Maksutov wrote:
So, Nipper, you think that shouting at us will convince us? About as much as that street preacher on the corner with his spittly sermons at sinners passing by. I can't help it if your God doesn't exist. Don't yell at me about it, he's your problem. :rolleyes: There are many Christians who disagree with how you interpret your book. You have an argument with them as well. Please try not to burn any at the stake, no matter what your book says. :lol:

So, you are one of those silly people who don't care what you say or how you say it, but actually think it's terrible to type in caps because you imagine that represents yelling! Prove God doesn't exist. Create biological life. Show that evil deeds go unpunished. There is no safety in numbers. P>S. The Bible NEVER promoted burning at the stake. That was introduced by pagans who burnt babies as sacrafices, and torched those they didn't like.

But speaking of rude, what is really rude is trying to disrupt a threat with opinions and interruptive conversations which are TOTALLY unrelated to that thread. :ugeek:


WHY ARE YOU SAYING THAT I AM RUDE!!

There, how do you like that, Nipper?

Oh, I do care what I say. And I'm fully aware that I'm posting on your Bible cut and paste "threat". That's my whole point. We're no longer in the Middle Ages when you could have had me killed for blasphemy or disagreeing with the priest. You can still do that in Bangladesh and Saudi Arabia, so there's hope for you there.

I also think that it's "rude" to claim, in effect, that thousands of scientists are liars and frauds while you promote an absurd and discredited perspective on the universe. It's your freedom to do so and my freedom to criticize it. Do you like freedom, Nipper?
"God" is the original deus ex machina. --Maksutov
_LittleNipper
_Emeritus
Posts: 4518
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:49 pm

Re: Bible verse by verse

Post by _LittleNipper »

Maksutov wrote:
LittleNipper wrote:So, you are one of those silly people who don't care what you say or how you say it, but actually think it's terrible to type in caps because you imagine that represents yelling! Prove God doesn't exist. Create biological life. Show that evil deeds go unpunished. There is no safety in numbers. P>S. The Bible NEVER promoted burning at the stake. That was introduced by pagans who burnt babies as sacrafices, and torched those they didn't like.

But speaking of rude, what is really rude is trying to disrupt a threat with opinions and interruptive conversations which are TOTALLY unrelated to that thread. :ugeek:


WHY ARE YOU SAYING THAT I AM RUDE!!

There, how do you like that, Nipper?

Oh, I do care what I say. And I'm fully aware that I'm posting on your Bible cut and paste "threat". That's my whole point. We're no longer in the Middle Ages when you could have had me killed for blasphemy or disagreeing with the priest. You can still do that in Bangladesh and Saudi Arabia, so there's hope for you there.

I also think that it's "rude" to claim, in effect, that thousands of scientists are liars and frauds while you promote an absurd and discredited perspective on the universe. It's your freedom to do so and my freedom to criticize it. Do you like freedom, Nipper?

I see nothing worded any differently but merely in capital letters. I suppose that you are trying to get my attention... I'm an average child of the 1950's who attended Sunday School and walked to school. I don't want you to hate me. I want you to want to come to heaven someday and meet there. And I don't see you getting there without the Lord Jesus Christ (Messiah). I copy and paste the Young's Translation because most people who have read the Bible never read that version. And I paraphrase it so that I can show others how I'm reading what is there. Here is a chance to read along and ask questions about what is being revealed. It is not a place to argue. And the age of the LAW ended on the cross. The decision is yours ---- threats never work, but all roads lead somewhere. I want you to be heading towards heaven. That road was paved with the blood of Jesus. May sound terrible but it's quite graphic and honest.
_Maksutov
_Emeritus
Posts: 12480
Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 8:19 pm

Re: Bible verse by verse

Post by _Maksutov »

LittleNipper wrote:
Maksutov wrote:
WHY ARE YOU SAYING THAT I AM RUDE!!

There, how do you like that, Nipper?

Oh, I do care what I say. And I'm fully aware that I'm posting on your Bible cut and paste "threat". That's my whole point. We're no longer in the Middle Ages when you could have had me killed for blasphemy or disagreeing with the priest. You can still do that in Bangladesh and Saudi Arabia, so there's hope for you there.

I also think that it's "rude" to claim, in effect, that thousands of scientists are liars and frauds while you promote an absurd and discredited perspective on the universe. It's your freedom to do so and my freedom to criticize it. Do you like freedom, Nipper?

I see nothing worded any differently but merely in capital letters. I suppose that you are trying to get my attention... I'm an average child of the 1950's who attended Sunday School and walked to school. I don't want you to hate me. I want you to want to come to heaven someday and meet there. And I don't see you getting there without the Lord Jesus Christ (Messiah). I copy and paste the Young's Translation because most people who have read the Bible never read that version. And I paraphrase it so that I can show others how I'm reading what is there. Here is a chance to read along and ask questions about what is being revealed. It is not a place to argue. And the age of the LAW ended on the cross. The decision is yours ---- threats never work, but all roads lead somewhere. I want you to be heading towards heaven. That road was paved with the blood of Jesus. May sound terrible but it's quite graphic and honest.


All caps has been interpreted as shouting in internet exchanges for a couple of decades now. It isn't just me saying this. Go on other fora and start posting in all caps and see what happens.

I don't hate you or Jesus or the Bible or anything like that Nipper. But I certainly disagree with you and will say so. You can describe that as an "argument" if you like.

I have spent my whole life trying to understand religion and religious people. I took the "leap of faith" when I was 18 years old. I set aside what I thought and had been taught and submitted myself to a church. It was the biggest mistake of my life. It was me trying to be someone else, someone that others wanted me to be. It put me at war with myself. Every time I listened to a religious talk I tried to find any way that I could to make it true, but after years of this I realized that I was coming up with it all myself. Someone wanted me to be something for their reasons, but they had no right to my life or to judge me. I say the same thing to you, Nipper. I sought Jesus and found him to be imaginary, a projection of people's own ideas and feelings, not objectively real. The books that claim to record his life are not convincing, any more than those that tell the life of Buddha or Mohammed. You can cut and paste, you can preach all you want, but if you do it to other people who have their own minds and wills, you will get resistance from some.

You act as if there is one way to understand the Bible. If you look at the last 2,000 years you can see that everyone has disagreed about the Bible and wars have been fought over these interpretations. Millions of Jews were murdered partly on the justification that they were "Christ-killers" because the Bible said so. These beliefs have real consequences, Nipper. That's why I'm here to challenge you when I think it's appropriate. I hope you won't take it personally.
"God" is the original deus ex machina. --Maksutov
_spotlight
_Emeritus
Posts: 1702
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2013 1:44 am

Re: Bible verse by verse

Post by _spotlight »

There is no safety in numbers. P>S. The Bible NEVER promoted burning at the stake. That was introduced by pagans who burnt babies as sacrafices, and torched those they didn't like.

Oh my. And your genocidal god? Is he supposed to return LittleNipper? Oh but stakes won't be employed so it's all good right? :lol:
Kolob’s set time is “one thousand years according to the time appointed unto that whereon thou standest” (Abraham 3:4). I take this as a round number. - Gee
Post Reply