Buffalo wrote:It's possible. Monson tells a lot of stories that sound like tall tales, or at least highly exaggerated. I'm reserving judgment on this until more information comes in.
Alright. I still say it'd save you guys a lot of angst if ya didn't bother with it at all.
Love ya tons, Stem
I ain't nuttin'. don't get all worked up on account of me.
Buffalo wrote:It's possible. Monson tells a lot of stories that sound like tall tales, or at least highly exaggerated. I'm reserving judgment on this until more information comes in.
all right. I still say it'd save you guys a lot of angst if ya didn't bother with it at all.
I think you're projecting. I don't think many here are feeling any angst. Just curiosity.
Doesn't saying "yep" to this question already expose you as one who already assumes Monson has fabricated the story? Ah well...if your view changes based on this, that's something.
Love ya tons, Stem
I ain't nuttin'. don't get all worked up on account of me.
Buffalo wrote:It's possible. Monson tells a lot of stories that sound like tall tales, or at least highly exaggerated. I'm reserving judgment on this until more information comes in.
all right. I still say it'd save you guys a lot of angst if ya didn't bother with it at all.
I'm angst-free, Stem. How about you?
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.
It appears that the believers here are saying that it is okay for President Monson makes stuff up as he goes along. After all, a faith promoting story that is embellished or changed to fit the audience should be okay right? (So long as it is faith promoting.)
While keeping in mind the demonstrably false tall tales of Paul Dunn or even those of Jeffery Holland as described on another thread, where does one draw the line?
Here is a suggestion for believers:
Next time you feel like giving a Church leader a pass for telling a tall tale, consider what your attitude would be if we were talking about the President of the country rather than the President of the Church.
Now that you have the firestorm of criticism and calls for impeachment firmly in mind, ask yourself why we should demand any less from our religious leaders (who claim truth) than than we do from our political leaders.
David Hume: "---Mistakes in philosophy are merely ridiculous, those in religion are dangerous."
DrW: "Mistakes in science are learning opportunities and are eventually corrected."
Doesn't saying "yep" to this question already expose you as one who already assumes Monson has fabricated the story? Ah well...if your view changes based on this, that's something.
Sure, I'm assuming there inconsistencies in his stories.