Pornography Poll: Personal Issues

[_Droopy]

Here is the citation: http://www.iub.edu/~kinsey/resources/FAQ.html

The Kinsey Institute? Are you really this intellectually facile, justme? Kinsey is probably the single most thoroughly discredited academic hack in modern history, and the real motives that animated the vast bulk of his junk science on the subject of human sexuality have been long exposed for what they are.

I really don't think using the discredited pseudoscience of a sexual psychopath and cultural terrorist bodes well for your credibility.

[_LDSToronto]

Here is the citation: http://www.iub.edu/~kinsey/resources/FAQ.html

The Kinsey Institute? Are you really this intellectually facile, justme? Kinsey is probably the single most thoroughly discredited academic hack in modern history, and the real motives that animated the vast bulk of his junk science on the subject of human sexuality have been long exposed for what they are.

I really don't think using the discredited pseudoscience of a sexual psychopath and cultural terrorist bodes well for your credibility.

Speaking of facile, did you follow the link and see that the research comes from the 2010 National Survey of Sexual Health and Behavior (NSSBH)? Did you really believe that the institution that bears Kinsey's name dug up his corpse and asked him to conduct research? I mean, why else would you discredit someone who didn't even participate in the research due to the fact that he is dead?

Next you'll be on and on about how Colonel Sanders is a racist and we shouldn't eat his chicken....

H.

[_just me]

Here is the citation: http://www.iub.edu/~kinsey/resources/FAQ.html

The Kinsey Institute? Are you really this intellectually facile, justme? Kinsey is probably the single most thoroughly discredited academic hack in modern history, and the real motives that animated the vast bulk of his junk science on the subject of human sexuality have been long exposed for what they are.

I really don't think using the discredited pseudoscience of a sexual psychopath and cultural terrorist bodes well for your credibility.

How Celestial of you.

Feel free to offer your counter evidence.

[_Droopy]

Speaking of facile, did you follow the link and see that the research comes from the 2010 National Survey of Sexual Health and Behavior (NSSBH)? Did you really believe that the institution that bears Kinsey's name dug up his corpse and asked him to conduct research? I mean, why else would you discredit someone who didn't even participate in the research due to the fact that he is dead?

The link is to the Kinsey Institute, which has been relentlessly pursuing Kinsey's original vision, ideology, and perspective since his death without interruption. The Kinsey Institute has no credibility. None, zero, nada. Kinsey's sexology as carried on by the institute that bears his name is still what it always was, an ideology of social reconstruction and Kulturkampf wrapped in the folds of social science.

For some reason, our culture cannot grow up intellectually with regard to Kinsey any more than it can grow up with regard to Marx, Keynes, and Dewey.

[_Droopy]

http://www.drjudithreisman.com/


Feel free to peruse the entire website regarding Kinsey himself, his legacy, the institute and its continuing influence and activities, pseudo-scientific "research," and the monumental perverseness of his own life that was the core of his scientific pursuits and public positions.

[_Droopy]

Here's some more food for thought:

http://www.cwfa.org/content.asp?id=6232

http://old.nationalreview.com/comment/c ... 140923.asp

http://www.cwfa.org/images/content/kins ... _11_03.pdf

And especially:

http://www.drjudithreisman.com/archives/chapter7.pdf

[_LDSToronto]

http://www.drjudithreisman.com/


Feel free to peruse the entire website regarding Kinsey himself, his legacy, the institute and its continuing influence and activities, pseudo-scientific "research," and the monumental perverseness of his own life that was the core of his scientific pursuits and public positions.

"Reisman has said that she believes that a homosexual movement in Germany gave rise to the Nazi Party and the Holocaust, she endorses The Pink Swastika, which elaborates on this view and has compared modern youth groups for gays to the Hitler Youth." ~wikipedia

Ya, ok....

Oh... here's the sweetest thing - her PhD is in Sexuality. Um, wait a second, no it's not, it's in Communications! Next thing you'll be using Dr. Laura or Dr. Peterson's "research" to back up your assertions.

H.

[_subgenius]

...If you were a man who was not able to perform sexually or a woman who's partner was not able to perform sexually I imagine that Viagra might have quite a lot of redeeming value.

I know believers who have tried it.

again, i ask...what "redeeming value" ?
Before viagra, if a man and a woman loved each other and had a wonderful sex life together, and then as the grew old together the man was less and less capable of performing, much to the dismay of his adoring, and post-menopausal, wife, was she suddenly justified in her abandonment of him? was somehow the love and intimacy of their life together in jeopardy of a bitter demise?
Was a great universal injustice being imposed upon her?

again, what is the "redeeming value" (a.k.a. virtue)

[_subgenius]

http://www.drjudithreisman.com/


Feel free to peruse the entire website regarding Kinsey himself, his legacy, the institute and its continuing influence and activities, pseudo-scientific "research," and the monumental perverseness of his own life that was the core of his scientific pursuits and public positions.

"Reisman has said that she believes that a homosexual movement in Germany gave rise to the Nazi Party and the Holocaust, she endorses The Pink Swastika, which elaborates on this view and has compared modern youth groups for gays to the Hitler Youth." ~wikipedia

Ya, ok....

Oh... here's the sweetest thing - her PhD is in Sexuality. Um, wait a second, no it's not, it's in Communications! Next thing you'll be using Dr. Laura or Dr. Peterson's "research" to back up your assertions.

H.

Bravo! one's resume' is so critical when validating their research...i agree wholeheartedly....
Oh, by the way...Kinsey was a zoologist....actually a zoology professor with great expertise in entomological and taxonomical research on the gall wasp.

really, one just has to look at the Kinsey report itself to find fault.
His questionable integrity by interviewing child molesters and allowing them to remain anonymous, based on his own judgment, and the sample populations are hardly convincing.
The most significant aspect of the Kinsey report is that it was well-timed to be a profitable publication...taking off in the 1960s....who would have guessed it would be received so well....and then look how that sexual revolution ran its course....ending in a billion dollar porn industry that exploits women and children, increased tolerance for debauchery, increase in sexually transmitted diseases, and increases in drug abuse.
He was simply a sex addict using science to fulfill his own perversions and inadequacies.
Though he does provide good support for the notion that LGBT is not genetic.

[_LDSToronto]

Bravo! one's resume' is so critical when validating their research...i agree wholeheartedly....
Oh, by the way...Kinsey was a zoologist....actually a zoology professor with great expertise in entomological and taxonomical research on the gall wasp.

really, one just has to look at the Kinsey report itself to find fault.
His questionable integrity by interviewing child molesters and allowing them to remain anonymous, based on his own judgment, and the sample populations are hardly convincing.
The most significant aspect of the Kinsey report is that it was well-timed to be a profitable publication...taking off in the 1960s....who would have guessed it would be received so well....and then look how that sexual revolution ran its course....ending in a billion dollar porn industry that exploits women and children, increased tolerance for debauchery, increase in sexually transmitted diseases, and increases in drug abuse.
He was simply a sex addict using science to fulfill his own perversions and inadequacies.
Though he does provide good support for the notion that LGBT is not genetic.

Look, discredit Alfred Kinsey all you want; have a field day! I'll even join you.

But, the simple fact remains - the research that Just Me cited was not conducted by the long dead Alfred Kinsey

Now, please go read the research and if you are so inclined, give a scholarly critique of research, it's methodology, and it's conclusions.

Thanks for trying though; that was real entertaining.
H.