Native American use of Sacred Metal Tablets

The upper-crust forum for scholarly, polite, and respectful discussions only. Heavily moderated. Rated G.
Post Reply
_Themis
_Emeritus
Posts: 13426
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 6:43 pm

Re: Native American use of Sacred Metal Tablets

Post by _Themis »

EdGoble wrote:I have never been the least impressed by people that maintain their Church membership, but who divorce themselves either from loyalty to the brethren, or from belief in general, who deconstruct their reality, when they have been commanded not to do that kind of thing, but they have been commanded to keep on track until the perfect day, and a mental deconstruction manifests a lack of desire or willingness to enduring to the end in a state of faith and belief. Sorry, but I'm unimpressed by the fact that you are still a member of the Church technically.


I'm not worried about what you are impressed about or not. I don't have a binary mind like you do here. I don't see the problem if one no longer believes Core truth claims of the church but still keeps certain connections to the church. It's quite common for members of all religions to have those who are literal believers all the way to non-belief but wanting to be apart of the group(for various good reasons). You make a lot of ignorant assumptions about how I think about things like church leaders. I would suggest you ask more questions and listen to other to find out what they really think.

You can choose to deconstruct anything you want to logically, and yes, it is a logical pathway if you want it to be. Indeed, it is true that the logic pathway does indeed lead where you say it does if it weren't for other information that you don't consider information, but I do.


Some want what the believe to be true more then they want to know the truth. I just want the truth if I can find it. I never said what people view as their spiritual experiences was not information. Of course it is. I am just asking how one knows their interpretation of that information is accurate.

It was a mistake for me to use the word "science" with regard to this subject. I did it without enough thought. It was something that I used in a sense of imprecision, without meaning that it is secular in some way, or that it resides in some secular domain of some sort. In this sense, what I really meant was to say that it is a certain spiritual realm of inquiry.


Choose what ever words you want. Spiritual realm, spiritual mind, Supernatural mind, supernatural information/sensations/manifestations. They are all still part of what we experience by our mind, or spiritual mind, or whatever you want to call it. These sensations still need an interpretation, and it's a wise person to ask how they know if an interpretation is accurate. You have said you are not interested in such with your religious beliefs. That is your choice.

There are so many people that I waste time talking to on message boards that think that I owe them secular proof for ontological things, which I don't. It always devolves back to that. Go tell God that you want proof of something ontological, like Korihor or Sherem, and if he doesn't give it to you, that's his problem, not mine. That's his realm over which he is in control, not me. These things come according to his will, not mine.


I'm asking how one knows this is true. I am not asking for you to prove it to me. I am asking how you know it for yourself. You keep avoiding this, and that is your choice, but it always come back to how we know things. These are good question whether about secular things or religious ones. Whether an alien is communicating telepathically to you maybe viewed as secular, but when it comes to a divine source it is religious. Both are really still the same problem of how we know what the source of communication is, and what the communication means.

However, I don't sympathize with people that have made a choice to not be faithful, regardless of their claimed reason for it. People stand responsible no matter what they claim forced them into something. An alcoholic is responsible for his own choices, regardless of how hard his life is. The fact that I'm overweight is my own choice, and nothing forced me to overeat, in spite of my anxiety caused by day to day stress, and eventually I will choose to lose it, I hope. But if I die because of it, then it will be sad, but nobody can be blamed but me, and people can be sad for me, but it is the result of the choice, and I alone stand responsible.


I sympathize with lots of people. Like those who lost faith in their religion and joined Mormonism and have lots of family problems for doing so, or those who lost faith in Mormonism and moved on somewhere else. People are good and I don't think a good God is going to punish people for honest choices, or rewards for blind faith. I hope you can lose the weight you want and get healthy, and can sympathize with the problems of why that can be hard to do.
42
_Themis
_Emeritus
Posts: 13426
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 6:43 pm

Re: Native American use of Sacred Metal Tablets

Post by _Themis »

tapirrider wrote:19:20 Ken Feder points out that the molecular clock estimates fall in the ballpark of the archaeological record from radiocarbon dating.


This is an important point. These are two completely independent dating techniques. This means if one or both don't work, it will be highly unlikely to have similar results. Especially consistent similar results. This is huge evidence for the accuracy of both dating techniques because the factors that could impact one will not impact the other. We can look at a lot of other dating techniques as well.
42
_Themis
_Emeritus
Posts: 13426
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 6:43 pm

Re: Native American use of Sacred Metal Tablets

Post by _Themis »

EdGoble wrote:However there are other types of integrity. Let's talk about authenticity of heart in the purpose one is engaged in, and the integrity of keeping promises, and integrity of fulfilling duties, not just some overblown notion of integrity the way you see it, and that you think that it is dishonest to not conclude what you have concluded. Actually, keeping covenants made in the temple, and not divulging what one ought not is considered a type of integrity. Keeping one's word when one makes covenants that one will keep promises made to the fathers to do their temple work is a type of integrity.


I was always taught that covenants we make in the church are a two way street and made between the person and God. If the church is not true then God is not a part of it ending any covenant requirements. If I run for office and promise to employ a certain policy if elected, only to find out later it is a very bad idea that will hurt those who voted for me, is that bad that I don't employ that policy?
42
_EdGoble
_Emeritus
Posts: 301
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2014 3:37 am

Re: Native American use of Sacred Metal Tablets

Post by _EdGoble »

Themis wrote:I'm not worried about what you are impressed about or not. I don't have a binary mind like you do here. I don't see the problem if one no longer believes Core truth claims of the church but still keeps certain connections to the church. It's quite common for members of all religions to have those who are literal believers all the way to non-belief but wanting to be apart of the group(for various good reasons). You make a lot of ignorant assumptions about how I think about things like church leaders. I would suggest you ask more questions and listen to other to find out what they really think.

Some want what the believe to be true more then they want to know the truth. I just want the truth if I can find it. I never said what people view as their spiritual experiences was not information. Of course it is. I am just asking how one knows their interpretation of that information is accurate.

Choose what ever words you want. Spiritual realm, spiritual mind, Supernatural mind, supernatural information/sensations/manifestations. They are all still part of what we experience by our mind, or spiritual mind, or whatever you want to call it. These sensations still need an interpretation, and it's a wise person to ask how they know if an interpretation is accurate. You have said you are not interested in such with your religious beliefs. That is your choice.

I'm asking how one knows this is true. I am not asking for you to prove it to me. I am asking how you know it for yourself. You keep avoiding this, and that is your choice, but it always come back to how we know things. These are good question whether about secular things or religious ones. Whether an alien is communicating telepathically to you maybe viewed as secular, but when it comes to a divine source it is religious. Both are really still the same problem of how we know what the source of communication is, and what the communication means.

I sympathize with lots of people. Like those who lost faith in their religion and joined Mormonism and have lots of family problems for doing so, or those who lost faith in Mormonism and moved on somewhere else. People are good and I don't think a good God is going to punish people for honest choices, or rewards for blind faith. I hope you can lose the weight you want and get healthy, and can sympathize with the problems of why that can be hard to do.


I know it by the Spirit, and you are one to over-analyze that. If you can't accept that I know it by the Spirit, then so be it. If you think there is more to it that you would require from me, then so be it. I tolerate these conversations until it doesn't make sense to engage anymore, and you can keep asking the same question over and over again until the conversation stops if you want to. If you want to declare victory because you didn't get out of me what you wanted, go right ahead.
But I outlined it and told you the process already about how it is known. I outline the process over again here. You can ask the same question over again if you like, but it doesn't change that I answered it. People who know it is the spirit help others to recognize it as the spirit, because others helped them know it is the spirit, because others helped them, and so on.
You say, how do you know that this sign is the spirit? Long experience by those who before knew it to be the spirit, until the manifestations become so intense that they cannot be denied.
How do you know that it is a sign of the Spirit of Truth? Because it harmonizes with everything that through long experience through many people's lives is the way that brought them happiness by living according to the things that it leads to.
And then finally it gets back to those who know by this spirit and by their faith until they finally rend the veil and the Savior stood before them, and they know without faith.
Accept this message as the answer now that you are going to get, because this is it. This is where this ends. If you don't consider it an answer now, then you wont on the next time you repeat the same question again either. I don't go around in circles with individuals like you for very long, because there is nothing productive about going in circles.
_bomgeography
_Emeritus
Posts: 646
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2016 4:48 am

Re: Native American use of Sacred Metal Tablets

Post by _bomgeography »

Lemmie wrote:
bomgeography wrote:I think your source is mistaken. The genetic link between native Americans out side of North America is X2A'j and its in Iran no where else. See parsimony tree

http://www.eupedia.com/europe/Haplogroup_X_mtDNA.shtml
[formatting is hard in cut and paste, if you don't mind I added some dashes so your quote matches the original format in the link]

X2
◦X2a'j
_◦X2a: found among Native North Americans
__◦X2a1
___◦X2a1a: found among the Sioux and Tanoan speakers
____◦X2a1a1
___◦X2a1b: found among the Ojibwe people
____◦X2a1b1
_____◦X2a1b1a
___◦X2a1c: found among the Ojibwe people
_◦X2a2: found in Nova Scotia and Newfoundland
◦X2j: found in North Africa

Where in the chart above does it show "X2A'j and its in Iran"?

Your own chart above agrees with my source and it does NOT support your assertion.
Because subhaplogroup X2a is not found in the Middle East and is not particularly closely related to the forms of haplogroup X that are found in that region, the haplogroup X data do not provide any evidence for a close biological relationship between Hopewell and Middle Eastern populations or any support for a direct migration from the Middle East to the Americas in pre-Columbian times.


Your mistaken the closest genetic link to native American haplo group x is in Iran. Haplo group x based haplo group x distribution is believed to have disseminated from Israel.


“These Galilee Druze individuals represent the refugium of an ancestral group with high diversity and high frequency of haplogroup X, which was more prevalent in the region in antiquity, and from which the global diversity of X mtDNA haplogroup emerged.”

“We found that 39 of 41 haplogroup X Druze individuals were from the Galilee heights (Table S2), corresponding to 21.4% (39/182) of the samples from that region. Enrichment analysis revealed that both X1 and X2 were highly enriched in this region”

Israel has a high percentage of X2 the highest outside of North America. There is no genetic link to native American haplo group x found in central and east asia and Siberia. Iran is the closest genetic link there no dispute about it.

See map

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_X_(mtDNA)#/media/File:Haplogroup_X_(mtDNA).PNG
_Lemmie
_Emeritus
Posts: 10590
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2015 7:25 pm

Re: Native American use of Sacred Metal Tablets

Post by _Lemmie »

David McKane, I see you are again responding to the exact same question with "you are mistaken," but now you are presenting a different source.

Before that is discussed, would you please respond to my question from the last round, where your "you are mistaken" link did NOT in any way support your position? My question is highlighted below in red:
Lemmie wrote:
bomgeography wrote:I think your source is mistaken. The genetic link between native Americans out side of North America is X2A'j and its in Iran no where else. See parsimony tree

http://www.eupedia.com/europe/Haplogroup_X_mtDNA.shtml
X2
◦X2a'j
_◦X2a: found among Native North Americans
__◦X2a1
___◦X2a1a: found among the Sioux and Tanoan speakers
____◦X2a1a1
___◦X2a1b: found among the Ojibwe people
____◦X2a1b1
_____◦X2a1b1a
___◦X2a1c: found among the Ojibwe people
_◦X2a2: found in Nova Scotia and Newfoundland
◦X2j: found in North Africa

Where in the chart above does it show "X2A'j and its in Iran"?

Your own chart above agrees with my source and it does NOT support your assertion.

Also, you have not responded to anyone's comments about your assertion, you just keep restating it with faulty and inappropriate links. Please note that failing to address to this statement below and just re-posting your faulty assumption with yet another bogus link is NOT a legitimate response:
Because subhaplogroup X2a is not found in the Middle East and is not particularly closely related to the forms of haplogroup X that are found in that region, the haplogroup X data do not provide any evidence for a close biological relationship between Hopewell and Middle Eastern populations or any support for a direct migration from the Middle East to the Americas in pre-Columbian times.

http://www.csicop.org/si/show/civilizat ... l_messages
_Themis
_Emeritus
Posts: 13426
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 6:43 pm

Re: Native American use of Sacred Metal Tablets

Post by _Themis »

EdGoble wrote:I know it by the Spirit, and you are one to over-analyze that. If you can't accept that I know it by the Spirit, then so be it. If you think there is more to it that you would require from me, then so be it. I tolerate these conversations until it doesn't make sense to engage anymore, and you can keep asking the same question over and over again until the conversation stops if you want to. If you want to declare victory because you didn't get out of me what you wanted, go right ahead.


You have never answered the questions I have asked. I haven't over analyzed it at all. We haven't even gotten past you assertion you know by the spirit. How do you know it was the spirit and how do you know your interpretation of the experience is correct? There is no way to go forward if you refuse to avoid these questions. Saying you know by the spirit tells us nothing, and is nothing more then saying I know because I know because I know. Many think they know by the spirit who have very different interpretations. It says the same thing if one says they know by Vega, or Xenu.

But I outlined it and told you the process already about how it is known. I outline the process over again here. You can ask the same question over again if you like, but it doesn't change that I answered it. People who know it is the spirit help others to recognize it as the spirit, because others helped them know it is the spirit, because others helped them, and so on.
You say, how do you know that this sign is the spirit? Long experience by those who before knew it to be the spirit, until the manifestations become so intense that they cannot be denied.
How do you know that it is a sign of the Spirit of Truth? Because it harmonizes with everything that through long experience through many people's lives is the way that brought them happiness by living according to the things that it leads to.


Actually you are really vague. People who know it is the spirit doesn't explain how they know. You claim other help other to recognize the spirit but then avoid saying what they do? You admit to believing the burning of the bosom or other feelings are a gift of the spirit. So how do you know that it is the spirit and not your body creating the sensation? Intensity can still be from your body, and why can the body not be trained to give you what you want? It's a great system of self delusion.

And then finally it gets back to those who know by this spirit and by their faith until they finally rend the veil and the Savior stood before them, and they know without faith.
Accept this message as the answer now that you are going to get, because this is it. This is where this ends. If you don't consider it an answer now, then you wont on the next time you repeat the same question again either. I don't go around in circles with individuals like you for very long, because there is nothing productive about going in circles.


It's just more assertion while avoiding the real issues you have no answers for. You don't know, but believe you do. I've been a believing member long enough to see other members don't really know even though many think they do. It doesn't mean I know in any absolute way a divine being doesn't work this way, but I at least will be very cautious and not ignore any evidence or logic that doesn't fit what I may want to believe.
42
_Lemmie
_Emeritus
Posts: 10590
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2015 7:25 pm

Re: Native American use of Sacred Metal Tablets

Post by _Lemmie »

bomgeography wrote:Your mistaken the closest genetic link to native American haplo group x is in Iran. Haplo group x based haplo group x distribution is believed to have disseminated from Israel.

“These Galilee Druze individuals represent the refugium of an ancestral group with high diversity and high frequency of haplogroup X, which was more prevalent in the region in antiquity, and from which the global diversity of X mtDNA haplogroup emerged.”

“We found that 39 of 41 haplogroup X Druze individuals were from the Galilee heights (Table S2), corresponding to 21.4% (39/182) of the samples from that region. Enrichment analysis revealed that both X1 and X2 were highly enriched in this region”

Israel has a high percentage of X2 the highest outside of North America. There is no genetic link to native American haplo group x found in central and east asia and Siberia. Iran is the closest genetic link there no dispute about it.

See map

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_X_(mtDNA)#/media/File:Haplogroup_X_(mtDNA).PNG


Well now you are just engaging in academic dishonesty. While waiting for you to address the previous questions, I looked at your quotes above, for which you provided a wiki link.

It turns out that both those statements in quotes are NOT from the wiki link, but are from YOUR SITE, in a post titled:
Tribe of Manasseh – Native American DNA
Posted on October 28, 2015 by David McKane

https://mormonbandwagon.com/dave/tribe-manasseh-2/

And apparently, in your essay, you lifted those quotes from somewhere else, giving only this (and nothing else!) for attribution:
One research paper has pointed out...

That's a very serious bit of dishonesty, David McKane.

As for the third statement you made, it is contradicted completely by your own wiki link.

I won't even bother to post the information; it's been done several times in the last few days by at least three different people, in this thread alone, and you have refused to address it every single time.
_bomgeography
_Emeritus
Posts: 646
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2016 4:48 am

Re: Native American use of Sacred Metal Tablets

Post by _bomgeography »

Lemmie wrote:
bomgeography wrote:Your mistaken the closest genetic link to native American haplo group x is in Iran. Haplo group x based haplo group x distribution is believed to have disseminated from Israel.

“These Galilee Druze individuals represent the refugium of an ancestral group with high diversity and high frequency of haplogroup X, which was more prevalent in the region in antiquity, and from which the global diversity of X mtDNA haplogroup emerged.”

“We found that 39 of 41 haplogroup X Druze individuals were from the Galilee heights (Table S2), corresponding to 21.4% (39/182) of the samples from that region. Enrichment analysis revealed that both X1 and X2 were highly enriched in this region”

Israel has a high percentage of X2 the highest outside of North America. There is no genetic link to native American haplo group x found in central and east asia and Siberia. Iran is the closest genetic link there no dispute about it.

See map

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_X_(mtDNA)#/media/File:Haplogroup_X_(mtDNA).PNG


Well now you are just engaging in academic dishonesty. While waiting for you to address the previous questions, I looked at your quotes above, for which you provided a wiki link.

It turns out that both those statements in quotes are NOT from the wiki link, but are from YOUR SITE, in a post titled:
Tribe of Manasseh – Native American DNA
Posted on October 28, 2015 by David McKane

https://mormonbandwagon.com/dave/tribe-manasseh-2/

And apparently, in your essay, you lifted those quotes from somewhere else, giving only this (and nothing else!) for attribution:
One research paper has pointed out...

That's a very serious bit of dishonesty, David McKane.

As for the third statement you made, it is contradicted completely by your own wiki link.

I won't even bother to post the information; it's been done several times in the last few days by at least three different people, in this thread alone, and you have refused to address it every single time.


Except for a altain haplo group x that arrived in asia after the Bering (barren ) ice bridge was not crossable Haplo group x is not in central east asia and Siberia. The only controversy is how did middle east dna arrive in Native Americans before Columbus.

I'm pretty sure how that happened.
_Lemmie
_Emeritus
Posts: 10590
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2015 7:25 pm

Re: Native American use of Sacred Metal Tablets

Post by _Lemmie »

Lemmie wrote:
bomgeography wrote:Your mistaken the closest genetic link to native American haplo group x is in Iran. Haplo group x based haplo group x distribution is believed to have disseminated from Israel.

“These Galilee Druze individuals represent the refugium of an ancestral group with high diversity and high frequency of haplogroup X, which was more prevalent in the region in antiquity, and from which the global diversity of X mtDNA haplogroup emerged.”

“We found that 39 of 41 haplogroup X Druze individuals were from the Galilee heights (Table S2), corresponding to 21.4% (39/182) of the samples from that region. Enrichment analysis revealed that both X1 and X2 were highly enriched in this region”

Israel has a high percentage of X2 the highest outside of North America. There is no genetic link to native American haplo group x found in central and east asia and Siberia. Iran is the closest genetic link there no dispute about it.

See map

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_X_(mtDNA)#/media/File:Haplogroup_X_(mtDNA).PNG


Well now you are just engaging in academic dishonesty. While waiting for you to address the previous questions, I looked at your quotes above, for which you provided a wiki link.

It turns out that both those statements in quotes are NOT from the wiki link, but are from YOUR SITE, in a post titled:
Tribe of Manasseh – Native American DNA
Posted on October 28, 2015 by David McKane

https://mormonbandwagon.com/dave/tribe-manasseh-2/

And apparently, in your essay, you lifted those quotes from somewhere else, giving only this (and nothing else!) for attribution:
One research paper has pointed out...

That's a very serious bit of dishonesty, David McKane.

As for the third statement you made, it is contradicted completely by your own wiki link.

I won't even bother to post the information; it's been done several times in the last few days by at least three different people, in this thread alone, and you have refused to address it every single time.

bomgeography wrote:Except for a altain haplo group x that arrived in asia after the Bering (barren ) ice bridge was not crossable Haplo group x is not in central east asia and Siberia. The only controversy is how did middle east dna arrive in Native Americans before Columbus.

I'm pretty sure how that happened.

Changing the subject and responding with nonsensical non-answers does not answer the questions, David. You could simply retract your statements pending some legitimate research on your part; that would be much less damaging to your reputation than these ridiculous cat and mouse non-answers.
Post Reply