I am not the one telling lies by fabricating false evidence David McKane. I am not the one trying to preach racist claims by using old scientific journal writings. And I am not the one going against the church's position and efforts to tone down the racism.
Your changing the subject you lied to me and the research done in the 90s and now is still current.
Stay on topic and admit the referendum on the the caucasian word is something you made up a hoax fake.
tapirrider wrote:I am not the one telling lies by fabricating false evidence David McKane. I am not the one trying to preach racist claims by using old scientific journal writings. And I am not the one going against the church's position and efforts to tone down the racism.
bomgeography wrote:Your changing the subject you lied to me and the research done in the 90s and now is still current.
Stay on topic and admit the referendum on the the caucasian word is something you made up a hoax fake.
What is this referendum you are bringing up? Where in the world did you get the idea that I said there was one? I have not lied to you, but you, on the other hand, are twisting things. And I never said that the research done in the 90s is no longer valid. David McKane, stop your childish games with me.
tapirrider wrote:I am not the one telling lies by fabricating false evidence David McKane. I am not the one trying to preach racist claims by using old scientific journal writings. And I am not the one going against the church's position and efforts to tone down the racism.
bomgeography wrote:Your changing the subject you lied to me and the research done in the 90s and now is still current.
Stay on topic and admit the referendum on the the caucasian word is something you made up a hoax fake.
What is this referendum you are bringing up? Where in the world did you get the idea that I said there was one? I have not lied to you, but you, on the other hand, are twisting things. And I never said that the research done in the 90s is no longer valid. David McKane, stop your childish games with me.
You said caucasian is a racist word and that scientist don't use it anymore
tapirrider wrote:What is this referendum you are bringing up? Where in the world did you get the idea that I said there was one? I have not lied to you, but you, on the other hand, are twisting things. And I never said that the research done in the 90s is no longer valid. David McKane, stop your childish games with me.
bomgeography wrote:You said caucasian is a racist word and that scientist don't use it anymore
What I said is that the way you use caucasian is racist and it is true that scientists don't use it anymore in the way you do. But where did you get the idea that I said there was a referendum? I never said there was one. And why is this referendum so important to you? Do you somehow think that it's non-existence grants you an excuse for the racism you espouse?
David McKane, I have not lied to you. But let's examine you for a moment.
tapirrider wrote:I gave you references on previous posts and you must have ignored them. I also listed all of the publications you are using when you do this and gave their dates and showed that later publications no longer use it. David, if I take the time to list all of this and the links again, will you dedicate time and effort to study them? Because this question and request of yours makes me think I wasted my time before.
bomgeography wrote:I did not see it could you post it please
David, it is dishonest to try to tell me that you did not see it. You even responded to it back in August on another forum.
David McKane, I am not the liar. And your insistence on a referendum is just another dishonest attempt on your part to fabricate something I never said.
David McKane, I have not lied to you. But let's examine you for a moment.
tapirrider wrote:I gave you references on previous posts and you must have ignored them. I also listed all of the publications you are using when you do this and gave their dates and showed that later publications no longer use it. David, if I take the time to list all of this and the links again, will you dedicate time and effort to study them? Because this question and request of yours makes me think I wasted my time before.
bomgeography wrote:I did not see it could you post it please
David, it is dishonest to try to tell me that you did not see it. You even responded to it back in August on another forum.
David McKane, I am not the liar. And your insistence on a referendum is just another dishonest attempt on your part to fabricate something I never said.
You lied about caucasian being this racist word the term is used by scientist all the time
No David, you are wrong again. I already told you that what I said is that the way you use caucasian is racist and it is true that scientists don't use it anymore in the way you do. I never said that the word on its own is racist and I never said that it isn't used in scientific publications. What I have told you is that the way it was used in those 1990s sources you link to is outdated. It is not used that way anymore in scientific journals.
It is sad that you use fabricated evidence and hoax artifacts in your claims about the Book of Mormon. It is intolerable that you are attempting to fabricate things I never said so that you can call me a liar.
bomgeography wrote:Stay on topic and admit the referendum on the the caucasian word is something you made up a hoax fake.
What is this referendum that you are trying to fabricate David McKane? This behavior of yours is childish.
Last edited by Guest on Tue Jan 03, 2017 5:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
No David, you are wrong again. I already told you that what I said is that the way you use caucasian is racist and it is true that scientists don't use it anymore in the way you do. I never said that the word on its own is racist and I never said that it isn't used in scientific publications. What I have told you is that the way it was used in those 1990s sources you link to is outdated. It is not used that way anymore in scientific journals.
It is sad that you use fabricated evidence and hoax artifacts in your claims about the Book of Mormon. It is intolerable that you are attempting to fabricate things I never said so that you can call me a liar.
bomgeography wrote:Stay on topic and admit the referendum on the the caucasian word is something you made up a hoax fake.
This behavior of yours is childish David McKane.
Your being ridiculous quoting research papers is in no way racist
bomgeography wrote:Your being ridiculous quoting research papers is in no way racist
No David, it is not a ridiculous matter. You are using outdated terminology from those journals and trying to apply it right now. That is a racist action on your part. And what is this referendum that you have accused me of saying existed?
bomgeography wrote:Your being ridiculous quoting research papers is in no way racist
No David, it is not a ridiculous matter. You are using outdated terminology from those journals and trying to apply it right now. That is a racist action on your part. And what is this referendum that you have accused me of saying existed?
no I'm not
You made it sound like caucasian is this racist term that scientist no longer use. You lied about that