Book of Mormon Evidence

The upper-crust forum for scholarly, polite, and respectful discussions only. Heavily moderated. Rated G.
Post Reply
_bomgeography
_Emeritus
Posts: 646
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2016 4:48 am

Re: Book of Mormon Evidence

Post by _bomgeography »

Lemmie wrote:keep it up, David McKane. It's your reputation that you are trashing.


I'm not worried. The map is clear

You are the guys making stuff up
_tapirrider
_Emeritus
Posts: 893
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2011 8:10 am

Re: Book of Mormon Evidence

Post by _tapirrider »

bomgeography wrote:The problem still exist tapir

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_X_(mtDNA)#/media/File%3AHaplogroup_X_(mtDNA).PNG

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_X_(mtDNA)#/media/File%3AHaplogroup_X_(mtDNA).PNG

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_X_(mtDNA)#/media/File%3AHaplogroup_X_(mtDNA).PNG

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_X_(mtDNA)#/media/File%3AHaplogroup_X_(mtDNA).PNG

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_X_(mtDNA)#/media/File%3AHaplogroup_X_(mtDNA).PNG

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_X_(mtDNA)#/media/File%3AHaplogroup_X_(mtDNA).PNG

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_X_(mtDNA)#/media/File%3AHaplogroup_X_(mtDNA).PNG

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_X_(mtDNA)#/media/File%3AHaplogroup_X_(mtDNA).PNG


The only problem is your failure to either understand or accept the timelines based on mutation rates and radiocarbon that destroy your claims about haplogroup x.
_bomgeography
_Emeritus
Posts: 646
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2016 4:48 am

Re: Book of Mormon Evidence

Post by _bomgeography »

DNA artifacts linguistic cultural and native American beliefs all prove the historicity of the Book of Mormon. And the dating of haplo group x is deeply flawed.
_tapirrider
_Emeritus
Posts: 893
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2011 8:10 am

Re: Book of Mormon Evidence

Post by _tapirrider »

bomgeography wrote:DNA artifacts linguistic cultural and native American beliefs all prove the historicity of the Book of Mormon. And the dating of haplo group x is deeply flawed.


No David McKane, the dating methods are sound. The flaws are in your attempts to misrepresent DNA, your use of known hoax artifacts and misrepresenting authentic ones, your linguistic claims that don't hold up and your erroneous claims about American Indian cultural and beliefs.
_bomgeography
_Emeritus
Posts: 646
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2016 4:48 am

Re: Book of Mormon Evidence

Post by _bomgeography »

tapirrider wrote:
bomgeography wrote:DNA artifacts linguistic cultural and native American beliefs all prove the historicity of the Book of Mormon. And the dating of haplo group x is deeply flawed.


No David McKane, the dating methods are sound. The flaws are in your attempts to misrepresent DNA, your use of known hoax artifacts and misrepresenting authentic ones, your linguistic claims that don't hold up and your erroneous claims about American Indian cultural and beliefs.


the circular arguments have begun the DNA evidence is clear. Evidence for a Siberian crossing is none existent. But since we are just going to repeat the same stuff I going to end the conversation with that.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_X_(mtDNA)#/media/File%3AHaplogroup_X_(mtDNA).PNG

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_X_(mtDNA)#/media/File%3AHaplogroup_X_(mtDNA).PNG
_tapirrider
_Emeritus
Posts: 893
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2011 8:10 am

Re: Book of Mormon Evidence

Post by _tapirrider »

bomgeography wrote:
the circular arguments have begun the DNA evidence is clear. Evidence for a Siberian crossing is none existent. But since we are just going to repeat the same stuff I going to end the conversation with that.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_X_(mtDNA)#/media/File%3AHaplogroup_X_(mtDNA).PNG

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_X_(mtDNA)#/media/File%3AHaplogroup_X_(mtDNA).PNG


This is not a circular argument. The facts stand against you because the DNA evidence is clear. Tell me David McKane, how can it be clear to you when you claim that its dating methods are deeply flawed? It would seem that the only things clear to you are what you want to see, while you continue ignoring truth.
_bomgeography
_Emeritus
Posts: 646
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2016 4:48 am

Re: Book of Mormon Evidence

Post by _bomgeography »

We have had this discussion a million times just check my post about DNA evidence.
_Themis
_Emeritus
Posts: 13426
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 6:43 pm

Re: Book of Mormon Evidence

Post by _Themis »

bomgeography wrote:
There is no evidence for the evidence that haplo groups x arrived via a Siberian crossing. The DNA cultural and linguistic and technology all spell a different timeline.


Still ignoring the DNA dating problem I see. Until then you have no credibility. You have also been shown wrong about cultural and linguistics, but I am not going to get into that.
42
_bomgeography
_Emeritus
Posts: 646
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2016 4:48 am

Re: Book of Mormon Evidence

Post by _bomgeography »

Themis wrote:
bomgeography wrote:
There is no evidence for the evidence that haplo groups x arrived via a Siberian crossing. The DNA cultural and linguistic and technology all spell a different timeline.


Still ignoring the DNA dating problem I see. Until then you have no credibility. You have also been shown wrong about cultural and linguistics, but I am not going to get into that.


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_X_(mtDNA)#/media/File%3AHaplogroup_X_(mtDNA).PNG
_tapirrider
_Emeritus
Posts: 893
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2011 8:10 am

Re: Book of Mormon Evidence

Post by _tapirrider »

bomgeography wrote:We have had this discussion a million times just check my post about DNA evidence.


We continue to have this discussion because your claims are false. Your posts are erroneous and racist and you have misrepresented DNA while insisting that the dating methods are deeply flawed.
Post Reply