Lemmie wrote:keep it up, David McKane. It's your reputation that you are trashing.
I'm not worried. The map is clear
You are the guys making stuff up
Lemmie wrote:keep it up, David McKane. It's your reputation that you are trashing.
bomgeography wrote:The problem still exist tapir
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_X_(mtDNA)#/media/File%3AHaplogroup_X_(mtDNA).PNG
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_X_(mtDNA)#/media/File%3AHaplogroup_X_(mtDNA).PNG
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_X_(mtDNA)#/media/File%3AHaplogroup_X_(mtDNA).PNG
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_X_(mtDNA)#/media/File%3AHaplogroup_X_(mtDNA).PNG
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_X_(mtDNA)#/media/File%3AHaplogroup_X_(mtDNA).PNG
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_X_(mtDNA)#/media/File%3AHaplogroup_X_(mtDNA).PNG
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_X_(mtDNA)#/media/File%3AHaplogroup_X_(mtDNA).PNG
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_X_(mtDNA)#/media/File%3AHaplogroup_X_(mtDNA).PNG
bomgeography wrote:DNA artifacts linguistic cultural and native American beliefs all prove the historicity of the Book of Mormon. And the dating of haplo group x is deeply flawed.
tapirrider wrote:bomgeography wrote:DNA artifacts linguistic cultural and native American beliefs all prove the historicity of the Book of Mormon. And the dating of haplo group x is deeply flawed.
No David McKane, the dating methods are sound. The flaws are in your attempts to misrepresent DNA, your use of known hoax artifacts and misrepresenting authentic ones, your linguistic claims that don't hold up and your erroneous claims about American Indian cultural and beliefs.
bomgeography wrote:
the circular arguments have begun the DNA evidence is clear. Evidence for a Siberian crossing is none existent. But since we are just going to repeat the same stuff I going to end the conversation with that.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_X_(mtDNA)#/media/File%3AHaplogroup_X_(mtDNA).PNG
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_X_(mtDNA)#/media/File%3AHaplogroup_X_(mtDNA).PNG
bomgeography wrote:
There is no evidence for the evidence that haplo groups x arrived via a Siberian crossing. The DNA cultural and linguistic and technology all spell a different timeline.
Themis wrote:bomgeography wrote:
There is no evidence for the evidence that haplo groups x arrived via a Siberian crossing. The DNA cultural and linguistic and technology all spell a different timeline.
Still ignoring the DNA dating problem I see. Until then you have no credibility. You have also been shown wrong about cultural and linguistics, but I am not going to get into that.
bomgeography wrote:We have had this discussion a million times just check my post about DNA evidence.