The Lost Manuscipt
Posted: Sat Aug 25, 2007 3:48 am
can someone explain to me in a simple way what the issues are for the lost manuscipts.
Martin Harriss took the pages for his wife to see and they were reportedly lost. Joseph Smith didn't want to re translate them because he said they would change the manuscript and it wouldn't match and he would be accused of being a fraud.
what are the other views, the skeptics view. I starting to work my way out of what appears to be a smoke filled room and am seeing about what other's are saying about the early history of the church, which is nothing like what is portrayed.
I would appreicate your thoughts.
also, I found a great article on the web about the church in ohio and wanted to pass on the link. Very fair didn't seem to have an agenda.
Link
Martin Harriss took the pages for his wife to see and they were reportedly lost. Joseph Smith didn't want to re translate them because he said they would change the manuscript and it wouldn't match and he would be accused of being a fraud.
what are the other views, the skeptics view. I starting to work my way out of what appears to be a smoke filled room and am seeing about what other's are saying about the early history of the church, which is nothing like what is portrayed.
I would appreicate your thoughts.
also, I found a great article on the web about the church in ohio and wanted to pass on the link. Very fair didn't seem to have an agenda.
Link