addressing the unknown
Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 9:04 pm
Whether it's true or not, who could not contend that the promises made by religion, even the ones made to the less obedient are very comfort compared to the reality of death, even the reality of a life filled with unnecessary suffering. Meaning and comfort, that's what made reiligion grow in my view.
What I'm struggling to see from my somewhat limited perspective is why we don't have any more new doctrine learned in church. We could all wish upon the power and comfort of resurrected body. Thought likes this raise my spirits. I don't see where it increases the Brethrens liability in prophecy since most off all these things won't be figured out till the next life, and obviously nobody will be called on it if it's a fraud. So why don't we talk more about the glories of heavan. Thos balms and opiates over my mind could make me whole like never before. In one way, my death and nihilism bothers me enough that believing that I'll never live again is strong enough a force to push me to look past the irrationality. The thing I just wanted to have but never could, immortality.
Yet how often do we talk of death, what happens after death, etc in church. We talk about living Christlike lives and that's pretty much it. No more new details on the construction and planning of Celestial or my Terrestrial townhouse.
I remain impressed with our Roger on his ability to come to grips with death and maintain many of the benefits that I needed the afterlife to get. I know Roger was a long time member and in leadership. Roger did you begin to find your peace with death in what I'd call nonMormon methods. Is this something that pervades the minds of leaders in that many have recongized that the resurrection was just a story and we need develop a group of selfless people who don't mind the Church making their life worse because the ultimate good that we are striving for is the good of the Church/Kingdom, not the ultimate good of the individual. Now, the after life could solve the problems a religion that demands selflness causes individual happiness, but they don't even resort to that much. How many LDS are serving actively, even the high priesthood leadership as I believe Roger once was are shying away from a focus of glory in the life to come. Funerals are more sad than I think LDS funerals should be. The gospel seemed to heal those wounds so well (not that my family members dying didn't hurt but my religion was very comforting.)
Roger I remain impressed with you seeming to cling to Christian values even though you limit them the only world that exists, right here. Take away eternity Chrisit's mythical real kingdom of the next world and one has to wonder why Jesus didn't mind getting himself killed in an effort to change the rules in Judaism, that in the end basically didn't work. Take away a final accounting and I can't help but say the gospel is mistaken, mild selfishness will produce way more happiness than activie selflessness ever did. At least thant's been my experience. Oh you degereate selfish fiend! You say. I'm not the oddball on this one. Watching the way people live everyday and how they feel about it confirms my statement many times over.
Point being after my disorganized ramble. It wouldn't be hard to make up some revelations on the afterlife that are just as impossible to verify will happen or not. But the stories could provide a psychological strength that would rival any Chinese opiate. And in spite of the argments made to the contrary, people can be evil even with beliefs trying to help them, but in general beliefs help make people better, especially from the Church's perspective. Is it possible that a lot of the upper echelon leaders don't really believe in an afterlife so much either, and are just slowly moving us towards a world without a resurrection? Did the brethren all just honestly they receive no new revelations.
It seems like you could spice church up so much by getting back to the original reasons people turned to religion (fear of death, lack of meaning in life and suffering). So many of these problems have solutions waiting in the next life, but our leaders seem so reluctant to talk about the next life. Are they moving us to a new age where we admit that the next life never really happened?
What I'm struggling to see from my somewhat limited perspective is why we don't have any more new doctrine learned in church. We could all wish upon the power and comfort of resurrected body. Thought likes this raise my spirits. I don't see where it increases the Brethrens liability in prophecy since most off all these things won't be figured out till the next life, and obviously nobody will be called on it if it's a fraud. So why don't we talk more about the glories of heavan. Thos balms and opiates over my mind could make me whole like never before. In one way, my death and nihilism bothers me enough that believing that I'll never live again is strong enough a force to push me to look past the irrationality. The thing I just wanted to have but never could, immortality.
Yet how often do we talk of death, what happens after death, etc in church. We talk about living Christlike lives and that's pretty much it. No more new details on the construction and planning of Celestial or my Terrestrial townhouse.
I remain impressed with our Roger on his ability to come to grips with death and maintain many of the benefits that I needed the afterlife to get. I know Roger was a long time member and in leadership. Roger did you begin to find your peace with death in what I'd call nonMormon methods. Is this something that pervades the minds of leaders in that many have recongized that the resurrection was just a story and we need develop a group of selfless people who don't mind the Church making their life worse because the ultimate good that we are striving for is the good of the Church/Kingdom, not the ultimate good of the individual. Now, the after life could solve the problems a religion that demands selflness causes individual happiness, but they don't even resort to that much. How many LDS are serving actively, even the high priesthood leadership as I believe Roger once was are shying away from a focus of glory in the life to come. Funerals are more sad than I think LDS funerals should be. The gospel seemed to heal those wounds so well (not that my family members dying didn't hurt but my religion was very comforting.)
Roger I remain impressed with you seeming to cling to Christian values even though you limit them the only world that exists, right here. Take away eternity Chrisit's mythical real kingdom of the next world and one has to wonder why Jesus didn't mind getting himself killed in an effort to change the rules in Judaism, that in the end basically didn't work. Take away a final accounting and I can't help but say the gospel is mistaken, mild selfishness will produce way more happiness than activie selflessness ever did. At least thant's been my experience. Oh you degereate selfish fiend! You say. I'm not the oddball on this one. Watching the way people live everyday and how they feel about it confirms my statement many times over.
Point being after my disorganized ramble. It wouldn't be hard to make up some revelations on the afterlife that are just as impossible to verify will happen or not. But the stories could provide a psychological strength that would rival any Chinese opiate. And in spite of the argments made to the contrary, people can be evil even with beliefs trying to help them, but in general beliefs help make people better, especially from the Church's perspective. Is it possible that a lot of the upper echelon leaders don't really believe in an afterlife so much either, and are just slowly moving us towards a world without a resurrection? Did the brethren all just honestly they receive no new revelations.
It seems like you could spice church up so much by getting back to the original reasons people turned to religion (fear of death, lack of meaning in life and suffering). So many of these problems have solutions waiting in the next life, but our leaders seem so reluctant to talk about the next life. Are they moving us to a new age where we admit that the next life never really happened?