Page 1 of 2
Proposed board rule change on in real life exposure
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 12:01 pm
by _MCB
IMHO, given the level of paranoia that people experience in their journey away from Mormonism, we need to be somewhat cautious. For example, I could have been banned for life in identifying "madeline," an old friend from another board.
OK. Here it is. Please make suggestions for revision quickly, as substantial changes will invalidate the poll. Ok, I already made a change, as per St. Paul.
Re: Proposed board rule change on in real life exposure
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:56 pm
by _madeleine
ha. I don't have any in real life information out there. Not because I worry about Mormons. I'm just a private person and don't think the world needs to know everything about me.
But, I don't care if people know I post on other forums besides this one. With the exception of whine me. He's a weird stalker person.
Re: Proposed board rule change on in real life exposure
Posted: Wed Jun 30, 2010 1:49 am
by _Paul Osborne
Ok, I don't care if people think I'm stupid.
But I have a simple question and I want you to answer it, please.
What in the hell does in real life stand for? You assume people just know. Well, they don't. I don't! So what do you think of that? Does that make me stupid? Does it make me lazy for not Googling it? Whatever, but I honestly don't know what in real life stands for.
Thank you in advance.
Paul O
Re: Proposed board rule change on in real life exposure
Posted: Wed Jun 30, 2010 4:16 am
by _Rambo
Paul Osborne wrote:Ok, I don't care if people think I'm stupid.
But I have a simple question and I want you to answer it, please.
What in the hell does in real life stand for? You assume people just know. Well, they don't. I don't! So what do you think of that? Does that make me stupid? Does it make me lazy for not Googling it? Whatever, but I honestly don't know what in real life stands for.
Thank you in advance.
Paul O
Hi Paul, it stands for "in real life" it took me a while to get that one. I don't think your stupid because I don't know what my wife and DH stands for. I know they mean husband and wife but what is with the D does that stand for designated, dumb, dimwitted, dillweed, darling.....?
Re: Proposed board rule change on in real life exposure
Posted: Wed Jun 30, 2010 4:30 am
by _madeleine
D is for dear, or darling.
Re: Proposed board rule change on in real life exposure
Posted: Wed Jun 30, 2010 5:15 am
by _Paul Osborne
Actually, "d" is for . . . . well, I better not say it. But I'm thinking all about it.
Would you like to guess the word that starts with a "d" that I'm thinking about? It's about something that really excites me and feels soooooooooo good.
I better go now. Have a nice day.
Paul O
Re: Proposed board rule change on in real life exposure
Posted: Wed Jun 30, 2010 6:07 am
by _madeleine
daiquiri?
drama?
dancing?
Re: Proposed board rule change on in real life exposure
Posted: Thu Jul 01, 2010 4:09 am
by _Paul Osborne
madeleine wrote:daiquiri?
drama?
dancing?
Wrong. But I'll give you a hint. The second letter is an i.
Paul O
Re: Proposed board rule change on in real life exposure
Posted: Thu Jul 01, 2010 5:34 am
by _madeleine
Paul Osborne wrote:madeleine wrote:daiquiri?
drama?
dancing?
Wrong. But I'll give you a hint. The second letter is an i.
Paul O
Oh, I see. I only use those words with the DH.
Re: Proposed board rule change on in real life exposure
Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 3:21 am
by _Polygamy-Porter
madeleine wrote:Paul Osborne wrote:
Wrong. But I'll give you a hint. The second letter is an i.
Paul O
Oh, I see. I only use those words with the DH.
???
D__kH__d?
haha