Wisdom Seeker wrote:From a non-LDS perspective is God neither male or female?
These quotes are representative, I believe, of the traditional Christian view (keeping in mind that God the Son, Jesus, is male in the sense of his human person). Of course, from a LDS point of view, all of this would just illustrate the corruption of gospel truths by Greek philosophical ideas.
Apology of Aristides (circa 125 A.D.):‘I say, then, that God is not born, not made, an ever-abiding nature without beginning and without end, immortal, perfect, and incomprehensible … He has no name, for everything which has a name is kindred to things created. Form he has none, nor yet any union of members; for whatsoever possesses these is kindred to things fashioned. He is neither male nor female. The heavens do not limit him, but the heavens and all things, visible and invisible, receive their bounds from him.’
God and the World (book length Interview with Pope Benedict):Is God male or female?‘God is God. He is neither male nor female but over and beyond those he is God. He is the Wholly Other. I believe that it is important always to remember that for biblical belief it has always been perfectly clear that God is neither male nor female, but is, precisely, God, and that both man and woman are in his image. They are both derived from him and their potentiality is in both cases contained within him.’
Catechism of the Catholic Church:‘Since our knowledge of God is limited, our language about him is equally so. We can name God only by taking creatures as our starting point, and in accordance with our limited human ways of knowing and thinking.
God transcends all creatures. We must therefore continually purify our language of everything in it that is limited, image-bound or imperfect, if we are not to confuse our image of God—"the inexpressible, the incomprehensible, the invisible, the ungraspable"—with our human representations. Our human words always fall short of the mystery of God.’