Priesthood Leadership Bloodlines

The upper-crust forum for scholarly, polite, and respectful discussions only. Heavily moderated. Rated G.
_Fence Sitter
_Emeritus
Posts: 8862
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2010 3:49 pm

Priesthood Leadership Bloodlines

Post by _Fence Sitter »

If a direct blood descendent of Joseph Smith were a faithful member of the LDS church would he have any greater claim to leadership positions in the church then the rest of the male members?
Do we still believe D&C 86:8-10

8.Therefore, thus saith the Lord unto you, with whom the priesthood hath continued through the lineage of your fathers—

9.For ye are lawful heirs, according to the flesh, and have been hid from the world with Christ in God—

10.Therefore your life and the priesthood have remained, and must needs remain through you and your lineage until the restoration of all things spoken by the mouths of all the holy prophets since the world began.
"Any over-ritualized religion since the dawn of time can make its priests say yes, we know, it is rotten, and hard luck, but just do as we say, keep at the ritual, stick it out, give us your money and you'll end up with the angels in heaven for evermore."
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: Priesthood Leadership Bloodlines

Post by _harmony »

Aren't all of his blood descendents part of the Community of Christ/RLDS?
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_moksha
_Emeritus
Posts: 22508
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:42 pm

Re: Priesthood Leadership Bloodlines

Post by _moksha »

Any hereditary positions or titles are merely a way of extending privileges on a generational basis. Trying to tie this into religious matters is the work of Man and not of God. Besides religious positions, Man has worked this concept into the secular arena as well, till you end up with someone like this:

Image
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
_Fence Sitter
_Emeritus
Posts: 8862
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2010 3:49 pm

Re: Priesthood Leadership Bloodlines

Post by _Fence Sitter »

moksha wrote:Any hereditary positions or titles are merely a way of extending privileges on a generational basis. Trying to tie this into religious matters is the work of Man and not of God. Besides religious positions, Man has worked this concept into the secular arena as well, till you end up with someone like this:



What then does the phrase "For ye are lawful heirs, according to the flesh". Seems like this is talking about Joseph Smith specifically.
"Any over-ritualized religion since the dawn of time can make its priests say yes, we know, it is rotten, and hard luck, but just do as we say, keep at the ritual, stick it out, give us your money and you'll end up with the angels in heaven for evermore."
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: Priesthood Leadership Bloodlines

Post by _harmony »

Fence Sitter wrote:
moksha wrote:Any hereditary positions or titles are merely a way of extending privileges on a generational basis. Trying to tie this into religious matters is the work of Man and not of God. Besides religious positions, Man has worked this concept into the secular arena as well, till you end up with someone like this:



What then does the phrase "For ye are lawful heirs, according to the flesh". Seems like this is talking about Joseph Smith specifically.


It helps to remember who wrote that. And his definition of "lawful".
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_Fence Sitter
_Emeritus
Posts: 8862
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2010 3:49 pm

Re: Priesthood Leadership Bloodlines

Post by _Fence Sitter »

harmony wrote: It helps to remember who wrote that. And his definition of "lawful".


I believe Joseph Smith wrote it or dictated it. Would you explain more on your 'lawful' comment?

Thanks Harmony.
"Any over-ritualized religion since the dawn of time can make its priests say yes, we know, it is rotten, and hard luck, but just do as we say, keep at the ritual, stick it out, give us your money and you'll end up with the angels in heaven for evermore."
_The Nehor
_Emeritus
Posts: 11832
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am

Re: Priesthood Leadership Bloodlines

Post by _The Nehor »

Fence Sitter wrote:
moksha wrote:Any hereditary positions or titles are merely a way of extending privileges on a generational basis. Trying to tie this into religious matters is the work of Man and not of God. Besides religious positions, Man has worked this concept into the secular arena as well, till you end up with someone like this:



What then does the phrase "For ye are lawful heirs, according to the flesh". Seems like this is talking about Joseph Smith specifically.


Lawful heirs, meaning that they are heirs of the priesthood through the lineage of Israel.
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
_Fence Sitter
_Emeritus
Posts: 8862
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2010 3:49 pm

Re: Priesthood Leadership Bloodlines

Post by _Fence Sitter »

Okay but is a lawful heir specific to Joseph Smith lineage in this verse?

Brigham Young said “Joseph Smith was entitled to the Keys of the Priesthood according to Blood”. I think that Brigham Young tried to convince Joseph Smith III to come to Salt Lake to assume a leadership role and I think that William Smith made similar claims to a right to run the church after his brother died.
"Any over-ritualized religion since the dawn of time can make its priests say yes, we know, it is rotten, and hard luck, but just do as we say, keep at the ritual, stick it out, give us your money and you'll end up with the angels in heaven for evermore."
_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: Priesthood Leadership Bloodlines

Post by _Kishkumen »

I think we should demand the pure blood of the Smiths on the throne of Mormon Church, which means we might be lucky enough to have a ruler like this one:

Image

Check out all of the benefits:

Charles II was plagued with it so severely, eating was difficult and his tongue was said to be too big for his mouth, resulting in a drooling and incoherent monarch. Add to this the hallucinations, convulsive episodes, and edemas and you have a melting pot of problems stemming from marriages that, over 200 years, were often between first cousins or uncles and nieces.


Wait a second...
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
_The Nehor
_Emeritus
Posts: 11832
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am

Re: Priesthood Leadership Bloodlines

Post by _The Nehor »

Fence Sitter wrote:Okay but is a lawful heir specific to Joseph Smith lineage in this verse?


No, it was said Joseph was of Ephraim and Jesse (i.e. right to establish a kingdom).

Brigham Young said “Joseph Smith was entitled to the Keys of the Priesthood according to Blood”. I think that Brigham Young tried to convince Joseph Smith III to come to Salt Lake to assume a leadership role and I think that William Smith made similar claims to a right to run the church after his brother died.


He was.
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
Post Reply