DiscussMormonism.com

His porn threads take away the spirit.

Droopy doesn't seem worthy.

The phrase "protests too much" comes to mind.

Mike, I think many of us come here to work out issues we are having or just let off steam regarding issues we are passionate about.

moksha wrote:Mike, I think many of us come here to work out issues we are having or just let off steam regarding issues we are passionate about.

Good point, Moksha. Carry on then, Droopy.

I'm just glad that Droopy has found a hobby. It's good to be able to talk about something you're deeply interested in.

this thread seems inappropriate for the celestial forum, especially considering the posted rules. How can this thread not be viewed as a personal attack on Droopy? even as a disrespectful communication?
It seems to be addressing the person not the idea.

moderator?

subgenius wrote:this thread seems inappropriate for the celestial forum, especially considering the posted rules. How can this thread not be viewed as a personal attack on Droopy? even as a disrespectful communication?
It seems to be addressing the person not the idea.

moderator?

Instead of complaining, why don't you join us in celebrating Droopy and his interests?

Buffalo wrote:

subgenius wrote:this thread seems inappropriate for the celestial forum, especially considering the posted rules. How can this thread not be viewed as a personal attack on Droopy? even as a disrespectful communication?
It seems to be addressing the person not the idea.

moderator?

Instead of complaining, why don't you join us in celebrating Droopy and his interests?

i have already posted where i consider the combined use of the terms "droopy" and "porn" to be inappropriate in any context.

subgenius wrote:i have already posted where i consider the combined use of the terms "droopy" and "porn" to be inappropriate in any context.

I suspect Droopy is combating his condition through vigorous exposure to this subject.

subgenius wrote:this thread seems inappropriate for the celestial forum, especially considering the posted rules. How can this thread not be viewed as a personal attack on Droopy? even as a disrespectful communication?
It seems to be addressing the person not the idea.

moderator?

I don't think it is disrespectful to suggest that Droopy's porn threads should be demoted to Terrestrial status. I also don't think it is disrespectful to point out the obvious: that he is protesting too much. But if moderators wish to close/lock this thread, that is fine by me. I just wanted to point out that nearly half of the celestial form posts are about porn.

I've said my peace.

Droopy's only doing this to come down off the high he gets from pleasuring himself to his Anne Coulter posters.