Page 1 of 1

Membership numbers in the UK, growth?

Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 1:10 pm
by _Drifting
Membership numbers in 2008 stood at: 183,672
Membership numbers in 2012 stand at: 188,029

Re: Membership numbers in the UK, growth?

Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 5:20 pm
by _bcuzbcuz
Drifting wrote:Membership numbers in 2008 stood at: 183,672
Membership numbers in 2012 stand at: 188,029


That is a growth rate slightly less than the normal population growth rate for the last 4 years. If Mormon membership had kept pace with the UK growth rate the 2012 numbers would be 188,869.

Re: Membership numbers in the UK, growth?

Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 5:30 pm
by _subgenius
bcuzbcuz wrote:
Drifting wrote:Membership numbers in 2008 stood at: 183,672
Membership numbers in 2012 stand at: 188,029


That is a growth rate slightly less than the normal population growth rate for the last 4 years. If Mormon membership had kept pace with the UK growth rate the 2012 numbers would be 188,869.

only myopia would lead someone to conclude "slightly less" from a less than 0.5% percentage deviation.
Geez you guys are in deep.

Re: Membership numbers in the UK, growth?

Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 5:52 pm
by _Morley
subgenius wrote:only myopia would lead someone to conclude "slightly less" from a less than 0.5% percentage deviation.
Geez you guys are in deep.


I assume you're talking about a statistical margin of error. Please show your work.

Re: Membership numbers in the UK, growth?

Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 6:01 pm
by _Drifting
Morley wrote:
subgenius wrote:only myopia would lead someone to conclude "slightly less" from a less than 0.5% percentage deviation.
Geez you guys are in deep.


I assume you're talking about a statistical margin of error. Please show your work.


:lol: that's like asking turkeys to vote for Thanksgiving...

Re: Membership numbers in the UK, growth?

Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 2:00 pm
by _subgenius
Morley wrote:
subgenius wrote:only myopia would lead someone to conclude "slightly less" from a less than 0.5% percentage deviation.
Geez you guys are in deep.


I assume you're talking about a statistical margin of error. Please show your work.

Uh, its not "my work".
It is shown in Bcuz's post, so Bcuz would need to show his work.

Re: Membership numbers in the UK, growth?

Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 2:04 pm
by _subgenius
Drifting wrote::lol: that's like asking turkeys to vote for Thanksgiving...

Drifting=Logical Fallacy purveyor
i understand why you must....empty gun syndrome

Image

Re: Membership numbers in the UK, growth?

Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 1:51 pm
by _bcuzbcuz
subgenus wrote:
only myopia would lead someone to conclude "slightly less" from a less than 0.5% percentage deviation.
Geez you guys are in deep.


188,029 or 188,869. I'll leave it up to you to decide which is slightly less. The "0.5% percentage deviation" is your statement. You do the math.