DiscussMormonism.com

Though a secular point of view, it is funny how they think...
Please see: http://discovermagazine.com/2007/nov/di ... reat-flood

http://science.howstuffworks.com/nature ... flood1.htm

That is pretty funny, alright.

LittleNipper wrote:Though a secular point of view, it is funny how they think...
Please see: http://discovermagazine.com/2007/nov/di ... reat-flood

http://science.howstuffworks.com/nature ... flood1.htm

Sorry, you are going to have to reject them since they will be using Carbon 14 dating.

Themis wrote:... you are going to have to reject them since they will be using Carbon 14 dating.

Tell me about it. I tried Carbon 14 Dating and they tried to set me up with a conifer.

and we see how they even deny science when it does not agree with their ego-entrenched positions.....sad really...but for them, as close to a concession as any other.

subgenius wrote:and we see how they even deny science when it does not agree with their ego-entrenched positions.....sad really...but for them, as close to a concession as any other.

Who is 'they' and 'them'?

The flood happened when Exu urinated. He had been holding it in for a long time.

moksha wrote:

Themis wrote:... you are going to have to reject them since they will be using Carbon 14 dating.

Tell me about it. I tried Carbon 14 Dating and they tried to set me up with a conifer.

Did you buy her a fir coat?

Themis wrote:

LittleNipper wrote:Though a secular point of view, it is funny how they think...
Please see: http://discovermagazine.com/2007/nov/di ... reat-flood

http://science.howstuffworks.com/nature ... flood1.htm

Sorry, you are going to have to reject them since they will be using Carbon 14 dating.

I have no trouble with Carbon Dating. But one must have a knowledge of past events to come to the right conclusions. Some are willing to accept the data found in the Bible and others simply ignore it.

LittleNipper wrote:I have no trouble with Carbon Dating. But one must have a knowledge of past events to come to the right conclusions. Some are willing to accept the data found in the Bible and others simply ignore it.

Is that to mean that if carbon dating says what nipper likes it is right, and if not it is wrong?