Page 1 of 5
marquis de sade
Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2013 1:31 pm
by _subgenius
Sade eloquently states the conclusion of atheism.
"We have received from Nature the right indiscriminately to express our wishes to all women . . . we have the right to compel their submission . . . Indeed! has Nature not proven that we have that right, by bestowing upon us the strength needed to bend women to our will. . . . I have incontestable rights to the enjoyment of her; I have the right to force from her this enjoyment, if she refuses me it for whatever the cause may be."
resolve the proprietary right of enjoyment if you can....without God all things are permissible.
agree or disagree?
Re: marquis de sade
Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2013 1:35 pm
by _Res Ipsa
Disagree, of course. It is with God that all things are permissible. Read your Old Testament.
Re: marquis de sade
Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2013 1:55 pm
by _Bazooka
subgenius wrote:Sade eloquently states the conclusion of atheism.
"We have received from Nature the right indiscriminately to express our wishes to all women . . . we have the right to compel their submission . . . Indeed! has Nature not proven that we have that right, by bestowing upon us the strength needed to bend women to our will. . . . I have incontestable rights to the enjoyment of her; I have the right to force from her this enjoyment, if she refuses me it for whatever the cause may be."
resolve the proprietary right of enjoyment if you can....without God all things are permissible.
agree or disagree?
What's your position, do you agree or disagree?
Re: marquis de sade
Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2013 2:34 pm
by _subgenius
Brad Hudson wrote:Disagree, of course. It is with God that all things are permissible. Read your Old Testament.
covering your bases?
so, either way we have the right to bend women to our will.
Re: marquis de sade
Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2013 2:37 pm
by _The Erotic Apologist
subgenius wrote:Sade eloquently states the conclusion of atheism.
Nevertheless, Subby cannot provide evidence that de Sade was in reality describing Mormon polygamy...
Re: marquis de sade
Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2013 2:37 pm
by _subgenius
Bazooka wrote:subgenius wrote:Sade eloquently states the conclusion of atheism.
"We have received from Nature the right indiscriminately to express our wishes to all women . . . we have the right to compel their submission . . . Indeed! has Nature not proven that we have that right, by bestowing upon us the strength needed to bend women to our will. . . . I have incontestable rights to the enjoyment of her; I have the right to force from her this enjoyment, if she refuses me it for whatever the cause may be."
resolve the proprietary right of enjoyment if you can....without God all things are permissible.
agree or disagree?
What's your position, do you agree or disagree?
Re: marquis de sade
Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2013 2:39 pm
by _subgenius
The Erotic Apologist wrote:subgenius wrote:Sade eloquently states the conclusion of atheism.
Nevertheless, Subby cannot provide evidence that de Sade was in reality describing Mormon polygamy...
Re: marquis de sade
Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2013 4:16 pm
by _Res Ipsa
Bazooka wrote:subgenius wrote:Sade eloquently states the conclusion of atheism.
"We have received from Nature the right indiscriminately to express our wishes to all women . . . we have the right to compel their submission . . . Indeed! has Nature not proven that we have that right, by bestowing upon us the strength needed to bend women to our will. . . . I have incontestable rights to the enjoyment of her; I have the right to force from her this enjoyment, if she refuses me it for whatever the cause may be."
resolve the proprietary right of enjoyment if you can....without God all things are permissible.
agree or disagree?
What's your position, do you agree or disagree?
I have it on good authority that if Subby actually states a firm position on any topic, the universe will implode.
Re: marquis de sade
Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2013 5:45 pm
by _subgenius
Brad Hudson wrote:I have it on good authority that if Subby actually states a firm position on any topic, the universe will implode.
your concern is admirable, but it does not clarify what keeps you from subscribing to Sade's philosophy above.
Re: marquis de sade
Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2013 6:26 pm
by _The Erotic Apologist
Bazooka wrote:subgenius wrote:Sade eloquently states the conclusion of atheism.
"We have received from Nature the right indiscriminately to express our wishes to all women . . . we have the right to compel their submission . . . Indeed! has Nature not proven that we have that right, by bestowing upon us the strength needed to bend women to our will. . . . I have incontestable rights to the enjoyment of her; I have the right to force from her this enjoyment, if she refuses me it for whatever the cause may be."
resolve the proprietary right of enjoyment if you can....without God all things are permissible.
agree or disagree?
What's your position, do you agree or disagree?
Yeah Subby, what's your position? Do you agree or disagree?
Or shall we assume your preferred position is
The Congress of the Cow?