DiscussMormonism.com

Here are the reasons why the Mik Maqs are the Nephites.

http://bookofmormonevidence.blogspot.co ... visit.html

The Micmaks ARE NOT and never were Nephites, and the Iroquois are not and never were Lamanites. The cold hard truth is that Lamanites and Nephites are fantasy only, from the 19th century racist fiction known as the Book of Mormon.

David McKane, you are trying to promote a fake history, a distorted version of the past that is just as untrue as the Central Band of Cherokee's claims that they are Indians when in fact they are nothing but whites pretending to be something they are not.

David, you should get a real life and leave the American Indians alone.

Tapir

I don't care about the Cherokee central band I never used there claims in my research on everything else I would disagree with you.

bomgeography wrote:Tapir

I don't care about the Cherokee central band I never used there claims in my research on everything else I would disagree with you.

So you're relying for all of this on a ms written by someone in the 17th century? Dude, back then people thought America was part of Atlantis.

You still won't try to publish stuff on this outside of the Nazi edited magazine. That speaks volumes.

bomgeography wrote:Tapir

I don't care about the Cherokee central band I never used there claims in my research on everything else I would disagree with you.

David, you are not being honest. You did in fact give me a Youtube link to information about the Central Band of Cherokee. You gave me the link in an attempt to support your wild, hair brained claims. To say you don't care about them now and that you never used them in your research is the same as lying.

As for your claims in your latest blog posts, they are as unreliable as everything else that you write related to American Indians. You are wasting your life away with racist claims about people that you do not belong to. You have zero credibility with me and lost even more this morning by lying to me. Come clean and be honest about what you tried to pull on me with the Central Band of Cherokee. Until then you are nothing but a liar trying to spread racist claims about American Indians.

The Central Cherokee band tribe is not in my research. In a comment on this blog I did mention the claims made by the central Cherokee band tribe wanting to be their own recognized tribe.

bomgeography wrote:The Central Cherokee band tribe is not in my research. In a comment on this blog I did mention the claims made by the central Cherokee band tribe wanting to be their own recognized tribe.

David, this is what you said to me:

bomgeography wrote:Tapir rider there are some Cherokee clans that believe they are from Hebrew descent.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=dMT0MePKRf8

They are not Cherokee, they are whites pretending to be Indians. It makes no difference if it was or was not in your research. You were the one who brought it up to me in a foolish attempt to support your so-called research.

David McKane, leave the American Indians alone. Your fantasy statements about them are the last thing that they or any person needs to hear. Your ridiculous claim that the Iroquois annihilated the Hopewell culture because the Iroquois are Lamanites and the Hopewell were Nephites, or your garbage claim that the Micmac are Nephites is of no value to American Indians. And what you are trying to do is no different than a group of whites pretending to be Indians. In your case you are trying to fabricate a fake history by claiming you have evidence. But your so-called evidence does not hold up. In the case of the Central Band of Cherokee, they tried to fabricate a fake history of themselves that did not hold up. Get a real life David and leave the American Indians alone.

When I stop finding evidence to the contrary I can see myself stopping. But the DNA artifact cultural and language evidence keeps presenting itself.

bomgeography wrote:When I stop finding evidence to the contrary I can see myself stopping. But the DNA artifact cultural and language evidence keeps presenting itself.

You have been posting the same discredited links, based on the same discredited information, since you began posting. Your references are hundreds of years old and constitute no evidence whatsoever.

I predict you will respond to this with a complete non sequitur composed of more fake information, why? What's your point?

Lemmie wrote:

bomgeography wrote:When I stop finding evidence to the contrary I can see myself stopping. But the DNA artifact cultural and language evidence keeps presenting itself.

You have been posting the same discredited links, based on the same discredited information, since you began posting. Your references are hundreds of years old and constitute no evidence whatsoever.

I predict you will respond to this with a complete non sequitur composed of more fake information, why? What's your point?

Last time I checked father Chretian Le clercq writings are not discredited.