DiscussMormonism.com

This is what I think artifacts from bountiful would be.

http://bookofmormonevidence.blogspot.co ... would.html

The Michigan relics are fake.

tapirrider wrote:The Michigan relics are fake.

It's stated in the post that the artifacts are considered fake. That is what bountiful artifacts would be like. Thousands of artifacts found in Michigan.

Those look even more fake than James Strang's plates. I love the Lake Powell Houseboat plate.

Turn it around: a fake text would look just like the Book of Mormon. Waddyaknow?

bomgeography wrote:It's stated in the post that the artifacts are considered fake. That is what bountiful artifacts would be like. Thousands of artifacts found in Michigan.

David McKane, do you consider them to be fake? How does a little disclaimer at the end of your blog that they are considered to be fake mean anything when you are promoting the idea that they are real. Are you intentionally incoherent?

tapirrider wrote:

bomgeography wrote:It's stated in the post that the artifacts are considered fake. That is what bountiful artifacts would be like. Thousands of artifacts found in Michigan.

Are you being intentionally incoherent?

No I don't think you may understand what the point of the post is. The Michigan relics have biblical depiction, hieroglyphs, Jesus Christ depictions, etc. I believe that is what city of bountiful artifacts would look like.

bomgeography wrote:
No I don't think you may understand what the point of the post is. The Michigan relics have biblical depiction, hieroglyphs, Jesus Christ depictions, etc. I believe that is what city of bountiful artifacts would look like.

You are right that I don't understand. I cannot understand why you are using known hoax artifacts and then trying to tell me that is what city of Bountiful artifacts would look like. Is this some kind of secret code admission that you are an anti-Mormon trying to make the church look bad? Please do tell, because it unimaginable to use known hoax artifacts and then try to say that is what city of Bountiful artifacts would look like. Stop being incoherent.

tapirrider wrote:

bomgeography wrote:
No I don't think you may understand what the point of the post is. The Michigan relics have biblical depiction, hieroglyphs, Jesus Christ depictions, etc. I believe that is what city of bountiful artifacts would look like.

You are right that I don't understand. I cannot understand why you are using known hoax artifacts and then trying to tell me that is what city of Bountiful artifacts would look like. Is this some kind of secret code admission that you are an anti-Mormon trying to make the church look bad? Please do tell, because it unimaginable to use known hoax artifacts and then try to say that is what city of Bountiful artifacts would look like. Stop being incoherent.

Ya tapir I'm anti Mormon. Read all those anti Mormon post.

bomgeography wrote:
Ya tapir I'm anti Mormon. Read all those anti Mormon post.

OK, so you claim to be Mormon. Do you think the Michigan relics are real? I ask because if you consider them fakes, I cannot understand why you are using them. Your post is incoherent.

tapirrider wrote:

bomgeography wrote:
Ya tapir I'm anti Mormon. Read all those anti Mormon post.

OK, so you claim to be Mormon. Do you think the Michigan relics are real? I ask because if you consider them fakes, I cannot understand why you are using them. Your post is incoherent.

It's does not matter what I think I just think that that the Bible depiction, hieroglyphs, and Christ depictions are what bountiful artifacts would look like.