DiscussMormonism.com

Posted: **Sun Dec 18, 2016 3:40 pm**

Posted: **Sun Dec 18, 2016 4:05 pm**

bomgeography wrote:There is direct or indirect evidence for every aspect of the ancient record.

No there isn't.

Posted: **Sun Dec 18, 2016 5:57 pm**

I wouldn't say there is direct or indirect confirming evidence for the Book of Mormon. The state of the evidence is still in the potential range where it exists. Who knows what we'll dig up tomorrow.

Posted: **Sun Dec 18, 2016 6:00 pm**

tapirrider wrote:
bomgeography wrote:There is direct or indirect evidence for every aspect of the ancient record.

No there isn't.

Well tapir we have never agreed on anything now have we?

Posted: **Sun Dec 18, 2016 6:29 pm**

The problem isn't Tapir, or Lemmie not agreeing with you, it is the best archeological, anthropological, and genetic evidence does not agree with your conclusions.

You are a peddler of hokum.

Posted: **Sun Dec 18, 2016 6:34 pm**

SteelHead wrote:The problem isn't Tapir, or Lemmie not agreeing with you, it is the best archeological, anthropological, and genetic evidence does not agree with your conclusions.

You are a peddler of hokum.

We have gone through this before you seem to think that such confirmed artifacts such as breastplates and cloth are hokum. That is not what archeologist say. They are not going to say that the hopewell are the Nephite but their artifacts and timeline do say that.

Posted: **Sun Dec 18, 2016 6:46 pm**

bomgeography wrote:Well tapir we have never agreed on anything now have we?

Why do you suppose that is?

bomgeography wrote:We have gone through this before you seem to think that such confirmed artifacts such as breastplates and cloth are hokum. That is not what archeologist say. They are not going to say that the hopewell are the Nephite but their artifacts and timeline do say that.

Confirmed artifacts like the hoax Michigan relics, fake elephant effigy pipes, or fake tribes like the Central Band of Cherokee and the way you willfully distort and misuse DNA? David McKane it is you who does not agree with what archaeologists and geneticists say. The real artifacts and timelines do not say what you want them to. Why do you keep singing the same song?

Posted: **Sun Dec 18, 2016 7:01 pm**

tapirrider wrote:
bomgeography wrote:Well tapir we have never agreed on anything now have we?

Why do you suppose that is?

bomgeography wrote:We have gone through this before you seem to think that such confirmed artifacts such as breastplates and cloth are hokum. That is not what archeologist say. They are not going to say that the hopewell are the Nephite but their artifacts and timeline do say that.

Confirmed artifacts like the hoax Michigan relics, fake elephant effigy pipes, or fake tribes like the Central Band of Cherokee and the way you willfully distort and misuse DNA? David McKane it is you who does not agree with what archaeologists and geneticists say. The real artifacts and timelines do not say what you want them to. Why do you keep singing the same song?

I stated the Michigan relics are fake. The hopewell artifacts are a different story. The hopewell artifacts breastplates headplates clothing etc are confirmed by modern day archeologist.

My personal opinion is that the thousands of Michigan relics are real along with the elephant effigies.
Archeologist say they are fake.

Posted: **Sun Dec 18, 2016 7:13 pm**

bomgeography wrote:

I stated the Michigan relics are fake. The hopewell artifacts are a different story. The hopewell artifacts breastplates headplates clothing etc are confirmed by modern day archeologist.

My personal opinion is that the thousands of Michigan relics are real along with the elephant effigies.
Archeologist say they are fake.

You stated that the Michigan relics are fake but you maintain that they are real? What are you trying to say? At least you admit that you do not agree with archaeologists.

Posted: **Sun Dec 18, 2016 7:42 pm**

tapirrider wrote:
bomgeography wrote:

I stated the Michigan relics are fake. The hopewell artifacts are a different story. The hopewell artifacts breastplates headplates clothing etc are confirmed by modern day archeologist.

My personal opinion is that the thousands of Michigan relics are real along with the elephant effigies.
Archeologist say they are fake.

You stated that the Michigan relics are fake but you maintain that they are real? What are you trying to say? At least you admit that you do not agree with archaeologists.

at least you admit breastplate and headplate artifacts and cloth are confirmed artifacts

DiscussMormonism.com

Book of Mormon Evidence

Book of Mormon Evidence

Re: Book of Mormon Evidence

Re: Book of Mormon Evidence

Re: Book of Mormon Evidence

Re: Book of Mormon Evidence

Re: Book of Mormon Evidence

Re: Book of Mormon Evidence

Re: Book of Mormon Evidence

Re: Book of Mormon Evidence

Re: Book of Mormon Evidence