DiscussMormonism.com

Nahom is archaeological evidence for the Book of Mormon. As one travels south-southeast of Jerusalem along the major trunk of the ancient Arabian, the route branches east toward the southeastern coast at only one point: Nehem. The tribal region Nehem happens to be west of bountiful. How did Joseph Smith get that right? For an ancient Israelite the Arabic word "NHM" looks like the Hebrew nhm which means "mourning". The Book of Mormon uses obvious Israelite wordplay for Nahom in chapter 16. Joseph Smith translated the Book of Mormon in less than 90 days without using any notes, so there is no way it is all a coincidence.

If you've been to Disneyland, you know that NHM is legit ( aNaHeiM ).

NHM has been found in hundreds of locations in the middle east.

Joseph Smith had from when he started spinning tales about angels until the Book of Mormon was published to work on the book, so roughly 6 years. The 90 days is a non starter.

NHM is evidence for nothing.

A great dismantling of NHM as evidence:
https://www.reddit.com/r/exmormon/comme ... mon_nahom/

There is no other NHM region in Arabia that dates before 300 BC. Joseph Smith used a hat for three months to dictate the Book of Mormon by the power of God.

peacemaker wrote:There is no other NHM region in Arabia that dates before 300 BC. Joseph Smith used a hat for three months to dictate the Book of Mormon by the power of God.

Don't forget he had a magic bit of banded jasper. That permitted attuning his hat (which was actual a quantum receiver) to receive downloads from the Akashic Records. The Book of Mormon is only one of many great spiritual texts that are available this way. Presently the sacred Mormon Palantir is held hostage by bureaucrats who will not permit it to be used as it was intended. It languishes unused because the leadership is without faith and the true power of God.

Welcome to the board, by the way.

It is very impressive that no other NHM tribal region exists in south Arabia

There is no NHM region period. The NHM inscription we are discussing is a tribal name, not a place name.

SteelHead wrote:There is no NHM region period. The NHM inscription we are discussing is a tribal name, not a place name.

Not only that, one of its promoters is a well known flying saucer advocate who apparently is capable of believing anything. He thinks George Adamski is credible.

https://www.amazon.com/Mormon-Looks-Ali ... B009KWN89O

Simon Southerton is familiar with him. Aston's a fantasist but he's convinced the TBMs on Meridian and elsewhere.

The Altar donated to the Temple of the Queen of Sheba by Bi‘athtar, son of Sawad, son of Naw‘an, the Nihmite, reads as follows, "I Bi'athtar certify that this is the place where Lehi and the Nephites stopped on their journey to the Americas. May they bless us with a reference in their Book of Mormon. PS. Any future translator should feel free to spell this location as Nahom".

SteelHead wrote:There is no NHM region period. The NHM inscription we are discussing is a tribal name, not a place name.

NHM is a tribe, but for Lehi's clan it was a place.

peacemaker wrote:

SteelHead wrote:There is no NHM region period. The NHM inscription we are discussing is a tribal name, not a place name.

NHM is a tribe, but for Lehi's clan it was a place.

Yes according to the story in the Book of Mormon Nahom was a place, but that means you are unwittingly admitting NHM is not evidence of Lehi really existing.