Response to "Do the GA's need secular qualifications&am

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Mister Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 5604
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:13 pm

Re: Response to "Do the GA's need secular qualification

Post by _Mister Scratch »

Bond...James Bond wrote:Thanks for the information guys.

Is there anywhere the LDS can go to study LDS doctrine exclusively?

Is there a program at BYU where you can study LDS doctrine exclusively? Like a subset of religious studys?

Bond


This pretty much cuts to the chase, and basically serves to reinforce my claim about FARMS and peer review. There is no such thing as "Mormonology," and to a certain extent, systematic study of LDS doctrine actually seems to be discouraged. I.e., there is always a great deal of hand-wringing when it comes to actually defining "official" doctrine.
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: Response to "Do the GA's need secular qualification

Post by _harmony »

Businessmen don't think out of the box? Guess we run in different circles.

As for the original question, none are theologians in the sense you use it. By having a lay clergy it is doubtful any theologion will even lead in the High Councils of the Church. CES teacher is about as close as one gets.


Businessmen have only one goal: show a profit at the end of the year. Minimizing overhead, reducing personnel, cutting benefits while increasing profits means a big bonus at year's end. Not much out the box thinking for that. The really innovative businesses are the ones that can minimize overhead while maintaining staff and benefits. When that happens, you have a Starbucks. But still, not exactly out of the box thinking. The real innovation comes from the inventors, the wizards, the R&D folks, not the businessmen. You know: the people whose bread and butter is thinking outside the box.

[edited to correct fuzzy grammer]
_Bond...James Bond
_Emeritus
Posts: 4627
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 4:49 am

Re: Response to "Do the GA's need secular qualification

Post by _Bond...James Bond »

harmony wrote:Businessmen have only one goal: show a profit at the end of the year. Minimizing overhead, reducing personnel, cutting benefits while increasing profits means a big bonus at year's end. Not much out the box thinking for that. The really innovative businesses are the ones that can minimize overhead while maintaining staff and benefits. When that happens, you have a Starbucks. But still, not exactly out of the box thinking. The real innovation comes from the inventors, the wizards, the R&D folks, not the businessmen. You know: the people whose bread and butter is thinking outside the box.

[edited to correct fuzzy grammer]


It's easy to show a profit when a business inexplicably gets hundreds of millions in donations every year from the customers.

I think this is modern day tax farming. Instead of the Roman Army enforcing it, its the threat of hell/outer darkness.

Bond
"Whatever appears to be against the Book of Mormon is going to be overturned at some time in the future. So we can be pretty open minded."-charity 3/7/07
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: Response to "Do the GA's need secular qualification

Post by _harmony »

Bond...James Bond wrote:
harmony wrote:Businessmen have only one goal: show a profit at the end of the year. Minimizing overhead, reducing personnel, cutting benefits while increasing profits means a big bonus at year's end. Not much out the box thinking for that. The really innovative businesses are the ones that can minimize overhead while maintaining staff and benefits. When that happens, you have a Starbucks. But still, not exactly out of the box thinking. The real innovation comes from the inventors, the wizards, the R&D folks, not the businessmen. You know: the people whose bread and butter is thinking outside the box.

[edited to correct fuzzy grammer]


It's easy to show a profit when a business inexplicably gets hundreds of millions in donations every year from the customers.

I think this is modern day tax farming. Instead of the Roman Army enforcing it, its the threat of hell/outer darkness.

Bond


So these businessmen accomplish their goal, and reap their bonus (adulation, reverence, power over millions of people) every year, and they don't even have to publish a detailed yearly report to the shareholders on how they spent those 'donations'.
_Bond...James Bond
_Emeritus
Posts: 4627
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 4:49 am

Re: Response to "Do the GA's need secular qualification

Post by _Bond...James Bond »

harmony wrote:
Bond...James Bond wrote:
harmony wrote:Businessmen have only one goal: show a profit at the end of the year. Minimizing overhead, reducing personnel, cutting benefits while increasing profits means a big bonus at year's end. Not much out the box thinking for that. The really innovative businesses are the ones that can minimize overhead while maintaining staff and benefits. When that happens, you have a Starbucks. But still, not exactly out of the box thinking. The real innovation comes from the inventors, the wizards, the R&D folks, not the businessmen. You know: the people whose bread and butter is thinking outside the box.

[edited to correct fuzzy grammer]


It's easy to show a profit when a business inexplicably gets hundreds of millions in donations every year from the customers.

I think this is modern day tax farming. Instead of the Roman Army enforcing it, its the threat of hell/outer darkness.

Bond


So these businessmen accomplish their goal, and reap their bonus (adulation, reverence, power over millions of people) every year, and they don't even have to publish a detailed yearly report to the shareholders on how they spent those 'donations'.


That's about my conclusion. Crazy right?

Bond
"Whatever appears to be against the Book of Mormon is going to be overturned at some time in the future. So we can be pretty open minded."-charity 3/7/07
Post Reply