Inaccurate?
Yep
What lense are you looking through?
Did you read my post? I told you what lense I was looking through.
The bretheren are completely confused at the outcome.
They are? And you know this how?
Dot the world with temples and you see a temporary boost in participation. Once the newness fades, the church clearly sees that members don't want to spend their afternoons changing clothes in the temple.
I gave you some local emprical evidence that demonstrates that for my ward and stake the small temple increased participation. All you have done is give your opinion. Do you have some hard data?
Year after year attendance continues to be lackluster.
Evidence and source please.
Sure, endowments are up a touch from before the temple building boom,
Thus temple attendance in overall, not down as you suggest.
but that wasn't the projected plan at all.
What was the plan? I thought is was to bring temples closer and make it more convenient for people to attend. It seems this has been accomplished.
Especially considering the incredible construction and ongoing maintenance costs. We all tightened our belts so that these temples could be erected and endowment sessions were going to sky rocket. How could the failure of this plan be any more pronounced
How did we all tighten our belt. The temples were constructed out of general funds I thought. As for session sky rocketing are you sure you are not setting up a stray man here? I am sure the church leaders hoped for an increase but sky rocket???