Some Schmo wrote:And let's face it, something needs to be said about consistency here. Evidence is only reliable if it's consistent. You do not get anything approaching consistency when it comes to evidence about god. You do, however, get much consistency when it comes to evidence of love, or evidence that people will likely want to drive on their own side of the road.
If you focus on prayer ONLY then your argument fails here. The only thing this proves is that several things may not work properly here. Either 1) praying to God isn't consistent because God is not really there, or 2) praying to God isn't consistent because of how the individual prays, or 3) praying to God isn't consistent because of weather conditions, or 4) praying to God isn't consistent because fish jump, or 5) praying to God isn't consistent because man invented electricity or (see what I'm saying? There could be a whole slew of things).
The consistency of a relationship also fails if one were to, say, slip into a coma, as that person is no longer interacting with the other, and therefore, you no longer have evidence that the individual still loves you. The consistency of a relationship fails if one drives a truck OTR because the interactions happen much less frequently. The consistency of a relationship fails if one of the individuals gets depressed... Its not consistent all the time, anymore than praying to God is.
Also, God is consistent in displaying wonders in the world, whether that be childbirth, or natural beauty, or the wonders of astrophysics, or chemistry, or a whole slew of other things. There it does not fail.