I'm down with Never-Moss. I almost proposed "Never-Moes" but my mind immediately went to "Never-Larrys" and "Never-Curlys" (nyuk nyuk). (Please read that before you've had caffeine: it will be disappointing otherwise.)Marcus wrote: ↑Wed Mar 13, 2024 4:24 pmThe Never-Mos(s) Postings brook no Rough-Rolled Stonings.Physics Guy wrote: ↑Wed Mar 13, 2024 2:29 pmThe posts of the collective Never-Mormon are welcome, even though the alien intelligence of its colossal hive mind is too overwhelming for it to be welcome itself.
(Yea, I know. I'll be back after I find some caffeine. Or my mind.)
Temple Sealings of Dead People who Were Married More than Once
- Bret Ripley
- 1st Counselor
- Posts: 459
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:55 am
Re: Temple Sealings of Dead People who Were Married More than Once
- Res Ipsa
- God
- Posts: 10555
- Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2020 6:44 pm
- Location: Playing Rabbits
Re: Temple Sealings of Dead People who Were Married More than Once
Never Moss is what I put on my roof every summer to kill the moss.
I think the most correctest would be "nevermoes," as in "potatoes" and "tomatoes." But my mind also leapt to Larry and Curly.
I think the most correctest would be "nevermoes," as in "potatoes" and "tomatoes." But my mind also leapt to Larry and Curly.
he/him
When a Religion is good, I conceive that it will support itself; and when it cannot support itself, and God does not take care to support, so that its Professors are oblig’d to call for the help of the Civil Power, ’tis a Sign, I apprehend, of its being a bad one.
Benjamin Franklin
When a Religion is good, I conceive that it will support itself; and when it cannot support itself, and God does not take care to support, so that its Professors are oblig’d to call for the help of the Civil Power, ’tis a Sign, I apprehend, of its being a bad one.
Benjamin Franklin
- Bret Ripley
- 1st Counselor
- Posts: 459
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:55 am
-
- God
- Posts: 5905
- Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2021 10:44 pm
Re: Temple Sealings of Dead People who Were Married More than Once
Caffeinated me still loved it! This Gene Kelly number also came to mind, for some reason...Bret Ripley wrote: ↑Wed Mar 13, 2024 4:44 pmI'm down with Never-Moss. I almost proposed "Never-Moes" but my mind immediately went to "Never-Larrys" and "Never-Curlys" (nyuk nyuk). (Please read that before you've had caffeine: it will be disappointing otherwise.)
Moses supposes his toeses are Roses,
But Moses supposes Erroneously....
Hooptie doodie doodle
"Hooptie doodie doodle" has to be the best chorus ever in the entire existence of musical theater. And don't tell mentalgymnast but I'm dying for him to come back so that I can find a way to tell him that "as a Moe, you are supposing erroneously."
- Morley
- God
- Posts: 1980
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 6:17 pm
- Location: 2023 National Medal of the Arts recipient, Mark Bradford's painting: Gatekeeper (2019)
Re: Temple Sealings of Dead People who Were Married More than Once
As I see it, one should never need an excuse to flounce. The right to flounce should be regarded as part of the unwritten order of things.Bret Ripley wrote: ↑Wed Mar 13, 2024 4:40 pm"Never-Mormons" -- quoth the Raven, had it been allowed to finish its sentence. (Oh, and spellcheck doesn't recognize the word "quoth.")
I very much like it the way it is. I wasn't complaining; but as one of these selfsame Never-Mo's I reserve the right to be offended by the apostrophe next time I'm losing an argument and need an excuse to flounce.Personally, I kind of like it the way it is.
- sock puppet
- Bishop
- Posts: 513
- Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2021 9:29 pm
Re: Temple Sealings of Dead People who Were Married More than Once
Bret Ripley wrote: ↑Wed Mar 13, 2024 6:49 pmI'm not too far from you, and moss and algae have convinced me: entropy is green.
"Apologists try to shill an explanation to questioning members as though science and reason really explain and buttress their professed faith. It [sic] does not. ...faith is the antithesis of science and reason." Critic as quoted by Peterson, Daniel C. (2010) FARMS Review, Intro., v22:2,2.