It’s still unclear, and he hasn’t bothered to put a citation on the image. He likes playing loose with attribution as we all know.Marcus wrote: ↑Tue Dec 03, 2024 9:08 pmWow. So he either manipulated the data, or got it from someone who did? That's a great example of what some emeritus BYU professors think of the honor code.drumdude wrote: ↑Tue Dec 03, 2024 4:08 pmAfter playing around with the data visualization tools and the information in the surveys, I found it extremely easy to bias the viewer of the graphic by strategically choosing which data to include and how to color it.
For example the data I provided about kids in 2 parent married households covers the whole age range and only shows a variation of between 50-80 percent.
The graphic Dan posted has a narrow age range of only a few years, and has a wider variation of between 30-70 percent. They also added a 3rd color specifically to highlight Utah. The consumer of the data is Mormons, who can have a warm fuzzy feeling of being vindicated with “facts.”
This is why the old saying goes, “there are lies, damned lies, and statistics.”
It’s far more important for him to clear up the record on Interpreter’s meaningless unbroken publishing streak.