From: Complex? (Spacing)

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
yellowstone123
Prophet
Posts: 864
Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2023 1:55 am
Location: Milky Way Galaxy

Re: From: Complex? (Spacing)

Post by yellowstone123 »

I do the same as M.G 2.0 Some people like me have sentence derangement syndrome so the response may not seem coherent. A person needs time and practice to develop a paragraph. Some create these skills with daily writing. I think most individual know that one needs additional support sentences after the topic sentence. I use A.I. at times but don't post it without letting the readers know it's from A.I or I rewrote it in my own words with some of the thoughts generating from A.I. M.G 2.0 could use A.I to write additional sentences after the topic sentence but then go back and rewrite it in his own words but let readers know A.I was involved.
Three things cannot be long hidden: the sun, the moon, and the truth.

— Buddha
User avatar
sock puppet
God
Posts: 1137
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2021 9:29 pm

Re: From: Complex? (Spacing)

Post by sock puppet »

Tator wrote:
Wed Jul 16, 2025 7:31 pm
It used to be, //////Slash//////Slash//////Slash///// now he's given himself some space.
No Axl?
"There will come a time when the rich own all the media, and it will be impossible for the public to make an informed opinion." Albert Einstein, ~1949 "It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere." Voltaire
Marcus
God
Posts: 7804
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2021 10:44 pm

Re: From: Complex? (Spacing)

Post by Marcus »

I Have Questions wrote:
Wed Jul 16, 2025 6:36 pm
...That describes MG 2.0's behaviour...
Yes. And his recent post is yet another example.

Compare his words...
MG 2.0 wrote:
Wed Jul 16, 2025 7:09 pm
I'm not upset folks. I do think you are upset that I upset your 'critic narrative '. In order to do that I do feel as though it is sometimes/often necessary to get in the 'thick of it'. Of course when I rock the boat there are going be some people that are going to go on the offensive and use whatever tactics at their disposal. Including this whole troll shenanigans.

I expect you're not going to give it up....
[extra bolding added]

...with this description:
...One of the most common characteristics of online trolls is an urge to seek attention or validation from others in an often negative or provocative way. They will usually post comments or messages on social media platforms with the intention of provoking a reaction from other users.

...In addition, many trolls take pleasure in causing distress to other users without feeling any remorse over their own conduct. These tendencies make it difficult for them to accept responsibility for their words and discourage them from engaging in meaningful dialogue with those they target...

https://www.truzzer.com/the-psychology- ... -comments/
MG 2.0
God
Posts: 8015
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm

Re: From: Complex? (Spacing)

Post by MG 2.0 »

Marcus wrote:
Wed Jul 16, 2025 11:20 pm
I Have Questions wrote:
Wed Jul 16, 2025 6:36 pm
...That describes MG 2.0's behaviour...
Yes. And his recent post is yet another example.

Compare his words...
MG 2.0 wrote:
Wed Jul 16, 2025 7:09 pm
I'm not upset folks. I do think you are upset that I upset your 'critic narrative '. In order to do that I do feel as though it is sometimes/often necessary to get in the 'thick of it'. Of course when I rock the boat there are going be some people that are going to go on the offensive and use whatever tactics at their disposal. Including this whole troll shenanigans.

I expect you're not going to give it up....
[extra bolding added]

...with this description:
...One of the most common characteristics of online trolls is an urge to seek attention or validation from others in an often negative or provocative way. They will usually post comments or messages on social media platforms with the intention of provoking a reaction from other users.

...In addition, many trolls take pleasure in causing distress to other users without feeling any remorse over their own conduct. These tendencies make it difficult for them to accept responsibility for their words and discourage them from engaging in meaningful dialogue with those they target...

https://www.truzzer.com/the-psychology- ... -comments/
Here she comes again. Looks like you haven't given it up yet. I expect that you'll return later with another "MG is a troll" proof.

The fun never ends with you! Umm...have you considered the possibility that people might be losing interest in all of this? :lol:

Later.

Regards,
MH
User avatar
Dr. Shades
Founder and Visionary
Posts: 3139
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2020 2:48 pm
Contact:

Re: From: Complex? (Spacing)

Post by Dr. Shades »

MG 2.0 wrote:
Wed Jul 16, 2025 3:21 pm
I honestly did/do not even see what all the hullabaloo is about. As has been mentioned other posters have probably been doing the same/similar things and there hasn't been a lead blowing in the wind.

And now we had/have a storm. Hard to figure out...why now?
Dude, why are you so adamantly opposed to making your posts better? It's like you're being dragged away from mediocrity kicking and screaming.
MG 2.0 wrote:
Wed Jul 16, 2025 7:09 pm
I'm not upset folks. I do think you are upset that I upset your 'critic narrative '. In order to do that I do feel as though it is sometimes/often necessary to get in the 'thick of it'. Of course when I rock the boat there are going be some people that are going to go on the offensive and use whatever tactics at their disposal. Including this whole troll shenanigans.

I expect you're not going to give it up.
MG 2.0, do you see how much easier this post of yours was to read? Did you notice how much better it "flows?" Now imagine if you had put two hard returns after every period. Can you imagine how "choppy," and therefore how much worse, your post would've been had you done so?
yellowstone123 wrote:
Wed Jul 16, 2025 9:15 pm
I use A.I. at times but don't post it without letting the readers know it's from A.I or I rewrote it in my own words with some of the thoughts generating from A.I.
In that case, be sure to post such, uh, posts in the artificial intelligence MEGATHREAD and nowhere else, please.
M.G 2.0 could use A.I to write additional sentences after the topic sentence but then go back and rewrite it in his own words but let readers know A.I was involved.
NO, HE CAN'T. He is prohibited from doing this.

yellowstone123, please, for the love of God and all His Holy angels, lead MG 2.0 not into temptation.
.
"Clarity from Mormon God only comes in very critical instances like convincing Emma that Joseph needed to sleep with other women."
--drumdude, 02-28-2026
I Have Questions
God
Posts: 3784
Joined: Tue May 23, 2023 9:09 am

Re: From: Complex? (Spacing)

Post by I Have Questions »

Marcus wrote:
Wed Jul 16, 2025 11:20 pm
I Have Questions wrote:
Wed Jul 16, 2025 6:36 pm
...That describes MG 2.0's behaviour...
Yes. And his recent post is yet another example.

Compare his words...
MG 2.0 wrote:
Wed Jul 16, 2025 7:09 pm
I'm not upset folks. I do think you are upset that I upset your 'critic narrative '. In order to do that I do feel as though it is sometimes/often necessary to get in the 'thick of it'. Of course when I rock the boat there are going be some people that are going to go on the offensive and use whatever tactics at their disposal. Including this whole troll shenanigans.

I expect you're not going to give it up....
[extra bolding added]

...with this description:
...One of the most common characteristics of online trolls is an urge to seek attention or validation from others in an often negative or provocative way. They will usually post comments or messages on social media platforms with the intention of provoking a reaction from other users.

...In addition, many trolls take pleasure in causing distress to other users without feeling any remorse over their own conduct. These tendencies make it difficult for them to accept responsibility for their words and discourage them from engaging in meaningful dialogue with those they target...

https://www.truzzer.com/the-psychology- ... -comments/
Yes that’s another direct example of how MG’s posts fit the “trolling” analysis.
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
I Have Questions
God
Posts: 3784
Joined: Tue May 23, 2023 9:09 am

Re: From: Complex? (Spacing)

Post by I Have Questions »

MG 2.0 wrote:
Wed Jul 16, 2025 11:59 pm
Here she comes again. Looks like you haven't given it up yet. I expect that you'll return later with another "MG is a troll" proof.

The fun never ends with you! Umm...have you considered the possibility that people might be losing interest in all of this? :lol:

Later.

Regards,
MH
Who is MH?
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
User avatar
Jersey Girl
God
Posts: 9101
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2020 3:51 am
Location: In my head

Re: From: Complex? (Spacing)

Post by Jersey Girl »

Why in the ever lovin' name of all that is holy and/or possibly unholy did I even open this thread? :o
LIGHT HAS A NAME

We only get stronger when we are lifting something that is heavier than what we are used to. ~ KF

Slava Ukraini!
User avatar
malkie
God
Posts: 2649
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 2:41 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

Re: From: Complex? (Spacing)

Post by malkie »

Jersey Girl wrote:
Thu Jul 17, 2025 9:33 am
Why in the ever lovin' name of all that is holy and/or possibly unholy did I even open this thread? :o
So that you had confirmation that SP and SSP are better places to be?
You can help Ukraine by talking for an hour a week!! PM me, or check www.enginprogram.org for details.
Слава Україні!, 𝑺𝒍𝒂𝒗𝒂 𝑼𝒌𝒓𝒂𝒊𝒏𝒊!
Marcus
God
Posts: 7804
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2021 10:44 pm

Re: From: Complex? (Spacing)

Post by Marcus »

malkie wrote:
Thu Jul 17, 2025 1:48 pm
Jersey Girl wrote:
Thu Jul 17, 2025 9:33 am
Why in the ever lovin' name of all that is holy and/or possibly unholy did I even open this thread? :o
So that you had confirmation that SP and SSP are better places to be?
:lol:
Post Reply