Jersey Girl wrote:dartagnan: I also saw Juliann's recent post which cites an email posted at my forum, and then says she won't link to my forum because of "inappropriate content." No, she just doesn't want people reading the context of what I have presented on my forum, that's all. SHe cannot respond there just like she cannot respond at MAD.
Jersey Girl: So what is Juliann's function? She won't link to your board because of inappropriate content but she has no problem reading it herself? More innuendo, folks.
Juliann has placed herself in self-imposed exile from these boards. She is not banned from here or Kevin's board.
To answer the original question, yes, posting links to this board from FAIR was ruled out by mods there.
"maklelan" if you're serious about this, you can use the search feature on the MAD board and eventually you'll come up with it. Try searching on the words "soft porn" and you should find a ruling to that effect.
The only guidelines that come close are one that forbids starting "board wars," and another mentioning no advertising for your board or website. We have actually had a couple of links to this board recently (that's how Ifound out about it) and no moderators have said a word. I think it's just another example of antagonists taking the liberty of interpreting someone else's rules for them. I have read the rules before and I just went to read them again before I posted that. I see nothing even remotely similar to what you're saying. Please provide a souce for this rule or quit whining.
maklelan wrote:The only guidelines that come close are one that forbids starting "board wars," and another mentioning no advertising for your board or website. We have actually had a couple of links to this board recently (that's how Ifound out about it) and no moderators have said a word. I think it's just another example of antagonists taking the liberty of interpreting someone else's rules for them. I have read the rules before and I just went to read them again before I posted that. I see nothing even remotely similar to what you're saying. Please provide a souce for this rule or quit whining.
maklelan,
As I stated previously, search on the phrase "soft porn" and you should find the ruling.
maklelan wrote:Yeah, I didn't find anything about this subject.
Hmmm...it could be that they've deleted the remarks. I suppose you could search on "Shades" or "Dr. Shades" and go back through those types of posts. The reason that Brackite posted this thread is because there was a moderator ruling against linking to this board. If I come up with anything, I'll post it in this thread.
Search tip for you, maklelan, it had to be prior to say Oct 30th of this year because the ruling and remarks were about an image that appeared on the previous board Shades had which was also MDB. This current board went online somewhere around the middle of October.
I can narrow it down further for you. Well, I used Google and low and behold, came up with my own protest post to the image that Infymus posted and actually listed my post from the previous MDB on his website!
May 22, 2006 was the date of my post. Here it is:
-Click For More- Keep The Garbage On Your Own Site Where It Belongs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE POSTED: May 22, 2006, at 08:09 AM
TOPIC: HATE MAIL RECEIVED ON MORMONCURTAIN -LINK ARTICLE-
ORIGINAL AUTHOR: The real LSD
Why would anyone patronize your site when it's painfully obvious that you don't have the capacity to figure out who the posters are much less what their affiliation is before you lash out at "all of these Mormons"? Do you expect people to be interested in anything you produce?
You aren't interested in discussion, truth or issues. You are simply a loose cannon looking for an LDS target to hit, even those that you manufacture in your own mind.
Do you honestly expect those who wish to contribute to the mutually shared goal of this forum to sit idly by while you post adolescent prank images without protesting them?
Perhaps you take pleasure in posting "soft porn graphics" on internet forums while you count your beers however, there are those who will not lend their screen name nor be affiliated with a board that is being presented to LDS as carrying "soft porn graphics" and that includes me.
Keep the garbage on your own site where it belongs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So, you'd be looking for something between May 22 and late October of this year.
Jersey Girl
(You will notice, maklelan, that I posted the protest under the screen name The real LSD. That is because when I started posting on Shades previous board, someone came in and registered under my easily recognizeable screen names from the LDS boards in an attempt to either keep me from posting here or misrepresent me by posing as me)
Last edited by Google Feedfetcher on Sun Jan 07, 2007 8:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.